My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:47:50 PM
Creation date
4/19/2012 8:08:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/18/1988
Doc Name
Design Report Sedimentation Structure
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment B
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
effort to be conservative, Peabody will use the largest soil erodibility <br /> factor of 0.32 at this time for design purposes (see Table 3) . <br /> Length - Slope Factors (L,S) <br /> Length and Slope Factors for each subwatershed were determined by <br /> measuring representative overland flow paths on topo maps within the <br /> subwatershed and taking an average of these measurements. As a general <br /> rule, lengths varied from 200 feet to 800 feet and slopes from 3 percent <br /> to 12 percent. <br /> Control Practice Factor (CP) <br /> The control practice factor for most soils and vegetation cover <br /> combinations ranges from 0.10 to 0.90. Again, in an effort to be <br /> conservative, Peabody will use 1.0 as the control practice factor on all <br /> subwatersheds at this time. <br /> Particle Size Distributions <br /> The particle size distribution for this sediment pond was taken from <br /> Simons, Li and Associates (Design of Sediment Control Measures for Small <br /> Areas in Surface Coal Mining) . This distribution is representative of a <br /> sandy loam soil similar to those described in Tab 9 of the current Nucla <br /> Mine Plan. The specific gravity of the soil and the submerged bulk <br /> specific gravity were estimated based on the references cited above. <br /> STORAGE CAPACITY <br /> The storage capacity of Sediment Pond 001 was also analyzed using the <br /> SEDIMOT II computer program. The capacity of this pond was designed to <br /> provide storage for the runoff entering the pond as the result of a <br /> 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event plus the inflow from potential pit <br /> pumpage while maintaining a minimum of 0.5-feet of freeboard from the <br /> emergency spillway elevation. This design also includes a minimum <br /> storage volume for sediment. When periodic sediment surveys of this <br /> pond indicate one or less 10-year, 24-hour MUSLE sediment storage <br /> availability, the pond will be dewatered and the accumulated sediment <br /> removed. Table 4 is a summary of the designed storage capacity. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.