My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:23:24 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 3:09:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Hydrologic Description (Part 2 of 2)
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the widths featured in the Tuttle Draw valley bottom, although the overall valley bottom <br /> shape in Calamity Draw is less steep and confining as Tuttle Draw. Unconsolidated <br /> streamlaid deposits are also commonly found in the bottoms of Calamity Draw. <br /> Channel Characteristics. The perennial nature of flow occurrence in both Tuttle and <br /> Calamity Draws in the vicinity of mining is largely due to irrigation. Surface water <br /> (irrigation return water) and to a lesser extent, ground water (originating from the <br /> upland, irrigated fields) discharging into each draw has resulted in deeply incised, <br /> narrow main channels that have relatively stable bank sides. Vegetation encroachment over <br /> time near and on the channel banks has enabled each channel to stabilize the incised <br /> channel geometry and stream course. <br /> The deeply incised but yet stable characteristics of the main channels in Calamity and, to <br /> a lesser extent, Tuttle Draws, can be attributed to the increased influence by man's <br /> activities. in a typical semi-arid environment, ( 15 inches annual precipitation) channel <br /> geometries and courses generally reflect the infrequent and highly variable discharges and <br /> sediment loads resulting from intense summer thunderstorms. These semi-arid ephemeral <br /> channels often feature shallow and wide bottoms with unstable banksides. Ephemeral <br /> channels will adjust geometries and courses to accommodate the varying discharges and high <br /> sediment loads, often radically changing local reach geometries and courses during large, <br /> flash flood events. However, as more upland areas are transformed from natural, semiarid <br /> vegetation to pasture, hayland and cropland by irrigation, streamflow variability <br /> (discharge and sediment loads) becomes dampened and is controlled by the increased <br /> vegetation and manipulation of the drainage system. This results in channels becoming <br /> more stable and often more incised, due to lower, less variable flows with lesser sediment <br /> loads. This occurrence is reflected in both the main channels of Calamity and Tuttle <br /> Draws. <br /> Stream gradients have been determined for select reaches along both Tuttle and Calamity <br /> Draws, as well as "return ditch" channels tributary to each. Table 7-37 presents stream <br /> channel gradients calculated for reaches between select surface water monitoring sites in <br /> the vicinity of both the Nucla Mine and the Nucla East mining area. The reader should <br /> refer to Exhibit 7-1 for the locations of each referenced monitoring site. From Table <br /> 7-37, it is evident that the overall stream gradients for both Tuttle and Calamity Draws <br /> are similar (.0229 ft/ft and .0248 ft/ft, respectively). However, within each basin, <br /> gradients of certain reaches within each stream channel can vary. For instance, the <br /> 7-108 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.