My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 11:44:24 AM
Creation date
4/18/2012 3:01:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
NPDES Permit CO-0000213
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 7 Appendix 7-6
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT of HEALTH <br /> Water Quality Control Dlvlsion <br /> 42.10 Last llth Avenue <br /> Denver, Colorado 110220 <br /> RATIONALE <br /> AMENDMENT NO. 1 <br /> PEA13ODY COAL - NUCI.A COAL MINE <br /> PERMIT NUMBER CO-0000213 <br /> MONTROSE COUNTY <br /> By letter of April 10, 1987, , the permittee has informed us of a new source of <br /> wastewater being discharged through outfall 001. Spoils spring water has <br /> begun emanating and Peabody has routed it into the 001 pond. The permit was <br /> written with Federal BAT limitations to cover discharges of surface runoff <br /> only. This new source necessitates a reassessment to determine whether <br /> additional limitations are needed to cover this mostly continuous source. <br /> For continuous sources, State water quality standards (WQS) must be met. The <br /> division uses a mass balance formula to calculate limits, then compares the <br /> limits to monitoring data to determine whether the limits must be imposed in <br /> the permit. The calculations for several parameters for this outfall are <br /> shown in Appendix A. <br /> The stream segment (Segment 12) which includes Tuttle Draw (immediate <br /> receiving water for outfall 001) has no metals standards. For this reason the <br /> division looks at maintaining the standards in the next segment (Segment 5, <br /> San Miguel River Subbasin, Gunnison River Basin). The 7-day, 10-year low flow <br /> for the San Miguel River at confluence with Tuttle Draw (7.0 cfs) is used. <br /> This looks at a worst case situation, that being where the entire flow in <br /> Tuttle Draw emirates from outfall 001 and the flow in the San Miguel River is <br /> at the Q7-10• Tile effluent flow which is used is the highest reported flow <br /> on file. <br /> The permittee submitted monitoring results from seventeen samples of the <br /> spoils spring prior to mixing with any waters in the pond 001. This data is <br /> used by the division for comparison. It is expected that effluent <br /> concentrations will be less than or equal to this data, due to settling which <br /> occurs in the pond. <br /> 7-6-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.