My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 2:35:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Hydrologic Description (Part 1 of 2)
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
where: <br /> 0 = flow (ft3 day-1) <br /> K = Hydraulic conductivity (ft day-1 <br /> ) <br /> A = Cross sectional area of the aquifer perpendicular to the flow direction (ft2) <br /> I = Average hydraulic gradient of the aquifer (ft/ft) <br /> The hydraulic conductivities (K) were calculated based on the saturated thicknesses <br /> determined from the potentiometric maps (Exhibits 7-2 through 7-4). The following <br /> assumptions were considered when determining K values for the overburden. Inflow (ground <br /> water discharge) equals outflow (baseflow stream discharge). The ground water discharge <br /> to streamflow occurs primarily in the upper portions of the overburden aquifer. Based on <br /> lithology the upper portions of the overburden aquifer have a higher transmissivity than <br /> the deeper portions of the aquifer. Consequently, transmissivity values have been <br /> adjusted to account for the difference. <br /> Cross sectional areas for the three aquifers were calculated by multiplying the width of <br /> each unit normal to the flow direction by the mean saturated thickness of each respective <br /> unit (see Exhibits 7-2 through 7-4). The average hydraulic gradients were determined at <br /> the vicinity of each cross section. <br /> K = 3.7 ft/day (Overburden at Cross Section A) <br /> K = 5.4 ft/day (Overburden at Cross Section B) <br /> K = 5.4 ft/day (Overburden at Cross Section C) <br /> K = 0.16 ft/day (Dakota Coal at Cross Section A and B) <br /> K = 0.46 ft/day (Underburden) <br /> I = .031 ft/ft (Overburden at Cross Section A) <br /> I = .0342 ft/ft (Overburden at Cross Section B) <br /> I = .043 ft/ft (Overburden at Cross Section C) <br /> I = .0297 ft/ft (Dakota Coal at Cross Section A) <br /> I = .043 ft/ft (Dakota Coal at Cross Section B) <br /> I = .0301 ft/ft (Underburden) <br /> A = 133,000 ft2 (Overburden at Cross Section A) <br /> A = 253,500 ft2 (Overburden at Cross Section B) <br /> A = 40,000 ft2 (Overburden at Cross Section C) <br /> 7-15 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.