My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:27:38 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 1:47:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Nucla East Geology and Overburden Assessment
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 6 Attachment 6-1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parameter Selection - Phase II <br /> Overburden parameters for the second phase sampling were selected after reviewing the <br /> Phase I data. Constituents which approached or exceeded marginally suitable to unsuitable <br /> guideline levels during Phase I sampling were included on the Phase II analyses list. <br /> Those constituents which were below detection limits were naturally omitted from the Phase <br /> 11 analyses list. <br /> Phase I overburden sampling and analyses results for the Nucla East study area were <br /> presented to the Division on June 22, 1987 (meeting, G. Wendt and S. Renner). A letter of <br /> agreement for the Phase II monitoring plan was subsequently submitted to the Division on <br /> July 6, 1987 (letter, G. Wendt to P. O'Connor) and approved by the Division on August 4, <br /> 1987 (letter P. O'Connor to J. Lunan). <br /> Laboratory parameters included paste pH, ammonium nitrogen, sodium adsorption ratio, and <br /> acid base potential . Phase II SAR analyses were confined to Sites 881E and 882E since <br /> elevated SAR values were identified only at Site 872E during Phase I drilling. <br /> Analytical Procedures - Phase I and Phase II <br /> At the lab ( InterMountain Lab, Farmington, New Mexico), chip samples and cores were air <br /> dried, split, and composited according to lithologic and stratigraphic sequence, crushed <br /> to pass a 10 mesh sieve, and bagged for storage. Prior to splitting and crushing intact <br /> cores, foreign material attached to the outside of the core was removed. Overburden chip <br /> samples from Phase I Site 871E were collected from 2-foot vertical increments. Adjacent <br /> 2-foot chip samples of similar strata were composited into 4- and 6-foot vertical <br /> increments prior to laboratory analysis. Phase II overburden chip samples were composited <br /> by similar strata while geologic descriptions were prepared during field sampling. <br /> All samples from the three Phase I cores and three Phase II combination core/bore holes <br /> were chemically and physically analyzed at InterMountain Laboratory using the procedures <br /> listed in Table 6-1-2. The parameter and procedure list was developed by Peabody's soil <br /> scientist (Gary Wendt) in consultation with the Division's reclamation specialists (Peter <br /> O'Connor and Steve Renner). Extensive reference was made to the Division's 1982 Water <br /> Quality and Overburden Geochemistry Guideline. <br /> 6-1-22 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.