My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:27:38 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 1:47:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Nucla East Geology and Overburden Assessment
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 6 Attachment 6-1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Phase I drilling program was implemented at Nucla East in 1984 to describe overburden, <br /> interburden, .and underburden characteristics over the entire study area, to obtain <br /> representative core hole locations from which cross sections could be developed, and to <br /> define the extent of suitable, marginally suitable, and unsuitable material . Three <br /> strategic and systematic drilling locations, spaced at 2,000 and 3,000 feet apart, were <br /> selected after evaluating the geologic cross section requirements and existing coal <br /> cropline/recovery information. Overburden (defined as all stratigraphy above the upper <br /> Dakota coal seam) thickness at Sites 871E, 870E, and 872 was approximately 30, 60, and 100 <br /> feet, respectively. The locations of these holes are shown in Exhibit 6-7. The Phase I <br /> sampling density of 1 hole/160 acres meets the hole intensity criteria discussed above to <br /> adequately describe the OIU variability. <br /> Contamination. Numerous overburden sample contamination problems have been documented <br /> over the last 10 years in the western United States. Drilling fluids, foam additives, and <br /> muds can appreciably affect the soluble constituents (especially EC, SAR, and NH4) in the <br /> sample. During rotary drilling for cores or cuttings, it is necessary to use a drilling <br /> medium such as air, water, or mud for lifting cuttings from the borehole. For overburden <br /> baseline studies, it is recommended that air be used whenever possible, water second, and <br /> mud (or foam) avoided unless absolutely necessary to overcome circulation problems or to <br /> lift cuttings from deep holes (Barrett et al., 1980; Power and Sandoval, 1976; Dollhopf et <br /> al ., 1981; and Peabody Coal Company, 1987). A chemical analysis should be obtained on the <br /> water, foam, and/or drilling mud whenever they are utilized. <br /> Random sample contamination often results in serious misinterpretations of the data. Many <br /> previously reported unsuitable copper, molybdenum, zinc, and especially lead <br /> concentrations were more apt to have been caused by drill stem grease contamination than <br /> natural mineralized strata. Dollhopf and Goering (1983). Dollhopf et al . (1981), Peabody <br /> Coal Company (1986), and Rochelle Coal Company (1984) all demonstrated that significant <br /> contamination resulted from zinc, copper, molybdenum, and lead based drill stem joint <br /> lubricants. A noncontaminating drill stem joint lubricant should be utilized when copper, <br /> lead, zinc, or molybdenum are included on the baseline parameter list. <br /> A noncontaminating drill stem joint lubricant (lithium based) was utilized at all 1986 <br /> sample sites within the Nucla East study area. Bore holes completed in 1986 were drilled <br /> exclusively with air. <br /> 6=1-13 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.