My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:27:42 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 1:39:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Geologic Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 6
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 6-9 <br /> Criteria for Evaluating Overburden, Interbuiiden <br /> Underburden and Regraded Spoil Suitability , <br /> Nucla Mine, Montrose County, Colorado <br /> November, 1986 <br /> Parameter Marginally Unsuitable Except <br /> Units Suitable Suitable With Amelioration <br /> pH > 5.52 4.5 - 5.44 <4.5 <br /> <8.53 8.6 - 9.05 > 9.0 <br /> Salinity (mmhos/cm)6 5 8 9 - 127 >12 <br /> Saturation <858 >85 <br /> Percentage (%) > 258 <25 <br /> Sodium Adsorption 51110 12 - 18 >1811 <br /> Ratio < 1410 15 - 22 >2211 <br /> Exchangeable Sodium9 s1512 16 - 18 >1813 <br /> Percentage (%) < 1812 19 - 22 >2213 <br /> Acid Base Potential14 < -5.014 >-5.0 <br /> Iron (ppm) < 30015 >300 <br /> Manganese (ppm) <- 7016 >70 <br /> Molybdenum (ppm)17 < 0.518 0.6 - 2.0 > 2.0 - 819 <br /> Nickel (ppm) < 2020 >20 <br /> Zinc (ppm) < 7021 >70 <br /> 1 These suitability levels are to be used as a guide in evaluating the <br /> degree of suitability for an overburden, interburden, underburden or <br /> regraded spoil material for reclamation. The evaluation should take <br /> into account the "total system". Interactive parameters may either <br /> nullify or verify the significance of a potential problem. <br /> 2 This value is sup <br /> ported by DSL (1983) and OSM (1985) . <br /> 3 This value is sup <br /> ported by SEAM (1979) , DSL (1983) and BLM (1977) . <br /> 4 The low limit of this range is supported by SEAM (1979) and USDA <br /> (1983) . BLM (1977) recommends a lower tolerance limit of 3.5 whereas <br /> DEQ (1985) suggests 5.0. <br /> The upper tolerance limit of this range is recommended by SEAM (1979) <br /> and DEQ (1985) whereas OSM (1985) proposes 8.8. <br /> 6 The actual j n MUM or maximum accepta le salinity level will depend on <br /> the plant species proposed in the revegetation plan, the potential for <br /> upward salt movement and the particle size. <br /> 6-43 Revised 11/01/86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.