My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:27:42 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 1:39:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Geologic Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 6
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State Reg. <br /> glomerate of the Dakota separates the Dakota Sandstone frcn the <br /> underlying Burro Canyon Formation (Lohman, 1965) . The Burro <br /> Canyon ccrrprises a varied assemblage of white, gray, and light <br /> brown sandstcne and conglomerates interbedded with green and <br /> purplish shales, siltstones, and mudstones, and thin beds of <br /> imrpure limestdne. It may attain a maximum thickness of 200 feet <br /> in the area (Williams, 1964) . <br /> In the Nucla Syncline, exposures of the Burro Canyon are re- <br /> stricted to the rims of mesas and deep canyons located to the <br /> west and northwest of the mine. Small map scale and lithologic <br /> similarity with the Dakota Sandstone cause these formations to <br /> be mapped together as undifferentiated in the southern part of <br /> the syncline (see Exhibit 6-1) . <br /> Pre-Burro Canyon Formations (U. Jurassic to Precambrian) . <br /> Table 6-1 summarizes the general lithologic characteristics and <br /> thicknesses for Pre-Burro Canyon Formations. As mentioned be- <br /> fore, these formations show slight to extreme variations in <br /> thickness between anticlines and synclines due to past tectonic <br /> activity and syntectonic sedimentation. Most, if not all, of <br /> these formations probably underly the Nucla Syncline. However, <br /> the lateral extent and thickness of most formations cannot be <br /> predicted accurately over a few miles distance. <br /> Exposures of these formations are generally restricted to the <br /> steeply, dipping flanks and cores of anticlines, and the walls <br /> and floors of deep canyons. Excellent exposures of all for- <br /> mations, except the Pennsylvanian Hermosa Formation, are seen <br /> in the Unaweep, Dolores, and San Miguel River Canyons along <br /> Route 141 between Whitewater, Colorado and Naturita, Colorado. <br /> 6-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.