My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-11-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1987-11-25_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2021 11:39:05 PM
Creation date
4/18/2012 12:45:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/25/1987
Doc Name
List of Violations (Part 1 of 2)
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 3 Attachment 3-9
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
83-97 Ozark Mine; Johnson & Franklin Counties, Arkansas <br /> NOV: FDS-16-83 <br /> (1) December 15, 1983 ; Arkansas Department of <br /> Pollution Control and Ecology, Surface Mining and <br /> Reclamation Division; <br /> (2) Failure to examine pond and file reports on <br /> structural weakness to the Director in accordance <br /> with 30 CFR 77-216.3; <br /> (3) Public hearing held; <br /> (4) Notice vacated; <br /> (5) N/A. <br /> 83-98 Kayenta/Black Mesa; Navajo County, Arizona <br /> NOV: 83-5-81-3 #1 of 2 <br /> (1) December 22, 1983; OSM; <br /> (2) Failure to adequately control the discharge of <br /> black water (coal wash) that is discharging from <br /> the emergency spillway of pond KM-A causing <br /> erosion of outslope and southwest embankment; <br /> (3) None; <br /> (4) Notice terminated; <br /> (5) Pond enlarged and area rip-rapped to direct <br /> discharge to the pond. <br /> 83-99 Kayenta/Black Mesa; Navajo County, Arizona <br /> NOV: 83-5-81-3 A2 of 2 <br /> (1) December 22, 1983; OSM; <br /> (2) Failure to have sedimentation ponds certified by a <br /> registered professional engineer as having been <br /> constructed according to their approved design; <br /> (3) None; <br /> (4) Order was terminated, therefore this violation was <br /> terminated. <br /> (5) Company submitted new as-built designs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.