Laserfiche WebLink
Total storm depths were obtained from the National Oceanic and <br /> Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rainfall atlas (Miller, 1973) . <br /> Standard Soil Conservation Service methods, available within the <br /> HEC-1 package, were used to determine excess rainfall and unit <br /> hydrograph routing for the watershed. The previous table lists the <br /> watershed parameters for the 10yr and 25yr events. <br /> Flows were routed through the pond using the Modified Puls method <br /> assuming level pool conditions. As stated the modeling scenario <br /> consisted of the pond, initially empty, with subsequent inflow of <br /> the 10yr and 25yr events, back to back. The volume of the 10yr-24hr <br /> event is determined to be 2 . 1 AF and the annual sediment load is <br /> estimated at 0. 1 AF, resulting in a total required pond volume of <br /> 2 . 2 AF. The existing pond geometry will be modified to attain this <br /> volume. The HEC-1 computer run to support the flood volume appears <br /> in the appendix 2, and the sediment yield is discussed in the next <br /> section. The peak inflow from the 25yr event is 7 cfs (appendix 3) . <br /> In turn the peak outflow through the combined spillway/low level <br /> outlet is 7 cfs. Most of the flow passes over the 8 ft. sharp edged <br /> weir/spillway. The maximum stage is 98 ft leaving the required 1 ft <br /> of freeboard to the top of the embankment, elevation 99. The crest <br /> elevation is 97.7 ft. Elevations associated with the pond are based <br /> on an assumed datum used in developing the topographic map supplied <br /> by National King Coal Company. <br /> In order to achieve a 48 hr drainage time for a full pond, 10yr- <br /> 24hr event, to empty, the size of the low level outlet was varied <br /> until the desired result were obtained. Documentation of the <br /> results can be found in the computer runs in the appendix 4. A <br /> circular orifice with a 3 .2 inch diameter is required. <br /> Watershed Sediment Yield <br /> Sizing criteria for the sedimentation ponds must include the <br /> effect of the annual sediment yield from the watershed as well as <br /> the volume of the 10yr-24hr event. Numerous empirical equations <br /> have been developed for estimating annual sediment yield. Probably <br /> the most popular are the variations of the Universal Soil Loss <br /> Equation (USLE) . This method was originally developed for <br /> agricultural lands and is dependent on at least 6 parameters which <br /> describe the physical, land use, and management characteristics of <br /> the basin. For watersheds with no observed data on these <br /> parameters, such as those at the National King Coal Mine site, the <br /> use of this type of equation requires guestimating most of the <br /> parameters. The errors in this could be excessive. Furthermore, <br /> most of the sediment yield in the National King Coal Mine <br /> watersheds is most likely is derived from channel erosion which in <br /> not considered in the USLE formulation. <br /> ' As an alternative to empirical estimates of sediment yield, this <br /> study uses measured values from around the country to bracket the <br /> 3 <br />