My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-04-22_REVISION - C1981035 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
1991-04-22_REVISION - C1981035 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2021 2:52:20 PM
Creation date
4/16/2012 1:01:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/22/1991
Doc Name
Letter in Response to Stipulation No.7
From
National king Coal
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hydrology <br /> Construction of intercept channels at the top and bottom of the <br /> waste bank and the relocation . of the natural eastside drainage <br /> channel are required. The top intercept channel will run the length <br /> of the waste bank at the top of the slope and be of sufficient size <br /> to carry the 100yr-24hr event. The contributing drainage area, <br /> above the bank, is approximately 8.3 acres. The Army Corps of <br /> Engineers ' HEC-1 Flood Hydrograph Package (HEC, 1981) was used to <br /> determine the design discharge. Total storm depth was obtained from <br /> the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rainfall <br /> atlas (Miller, 1973) . Standard Soil Conservation Service methods, <br /> available within the HEC-1 package, were used to determine excess <br /> rainfall and unit hydrograph routing. The following table lists the <br /> watershed parameters used in determining the design discharge for <br /> the intercept channel. <br /> Watershed Parameters for Intercept Channel above Waste Pile <br /> Drainage Area = 8 . 3 acres <br /> Length to Divide z 500 ft <br /> Curve Number = 78 <br /> Average Slope = 48% <br /> Lag Time = 4 minutes <br /> The reach from section 1 to section 10 will be divided into two <br /> separate parts at section 6 and thus the contributing area to <br /> either channel will be half that listed in the table. The resulting <br /> peak discharge for each part is 4 cfs. <br /> A backwater analysis was performed to size the intercept channel <br /> using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ' HEC-2 , Water Surface <br /> Profiles computer model (HEC, 1982) . The channel will be triangular <br /> in shape with a 3 ft. top width, 1: 1 side slopes and will be placed <br /> on a minimum invert slope of 0. 010. The channel will be graded to <br /> drain from section 1 to section 4 and from section 6 to section 4 . <br /> Similarly the upper portion of intercept channel will drain from <br /> section 6 to section 7 and from section 10 to section 7 . Runoff <br /> collecting at sections 4 and 7 will be drained through an 18" <br /> diameter pipe down the waste bank and will terminate at the <br /> eastside drainage channel. A profile of the waste bank and the <br /> channels is shown in figure 3 . At the point where the flow exits <br /> the pipes the drainage channel must be armored with rip-rap (6" to <br /> 24" well graded) material to prevent local scour of the eastside <br /> drainage. Computer printouts for both the HEC-1 and HEC-2 runs <br /> discussed above are included in the appendix. <br /> A similar channel is required at the toe of the slope to <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.