My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-04-10_HYDROLOGY - M1991035 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1991035
>
2012-04-10_HYDROLOGY - M1991035 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:56:05 PM
Creation date
4/10/2012 3:10:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991035
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
4/10/2012
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO MINING OPERATIONS WITH EXPOSED GROUNDWATER
From
APPLEGATE GROUP
To
DRMS
Email Name
TAK
AJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T l., <br />Applegate <br />Group, inc. <br />Water Resource Advisors for the West <br />April 9, 2012 <br />Mr. Tony Waldron <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: <br />Response to _DRMS Letter Regarding <br />M1991035 (Bluestone Pit); M19.2404�J <br />Dear Tony: <br />Vk I 1qj10) <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 10 2012 <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />7 v Mining & Safety <br />aka Section 16 Pit) <br />On behalf of Lafarge West, Inc. (Lafarge), I am writing to provide an update regarding future <br />plans for the two Bluestone Pits operated by Lafarge. In a previous letter to you, dated April 28, <br />2011, I provided a preliminary estimate of the cost to install a liner at these sites; Lafarge <br />anticipated that installation of such a liner would be required in order to maintain compliance <br />with Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) requirements. After subsequent <br />research and internal discussion by Lafarge, the plan for these sites has changed. <br />The Bluestone Pit (M1991035) will be graded to backfill all existing ponds to a depth of two feet <br />above groundwater. The north pond will be the only one that is not backfilled; this particular <br />pond was created by others long before the mining permit was issued and has not been enlarged <br />by Lafarge's operations. As shown in the attached Figure 1, aerial photography taken prior to <br />1981 appears to show that the pond existed at that time, in which case it could potentially qualify <br />for an exemption from administration pursuant to C.R.S. §37 -90- 137(11) assuming the pond was <br />created in connection with sand and gravel excavation. Since the site was unpermitted when the <br />pond was created, it is currently unknown if sand and gravel were being mined at the site. <br />Regardless, it is Lafarge's position is that it is not responsible for reclaiming this particular pond <br />and the current bond for the site (in the amount of $423,800) is sufficient to accomplish the <br />proposed grading; therefore no additional bonding is required. <br />The / Section 16 Pit (M1994045) has been inactive since Lafarge became the operator <br />in 2002. The existing excavations at the site were created by others long before the mining <br />permit was issued and Lafarge has not enlarged the existing excavations in any way. Similar to <br />the other Bluestone Pit, aerial photography (see attached Figure 2) shows that this excavation <br />was created prior to 1981 and therefore may also qualify for an administrative exemption <br />assuming the excavation was created in connection with the extraction of sand and gravel. Since <br />1490 W. 121stAvenue, Suite 100 (303) 452 -6611 • Fax (303) 452 -2759 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 100 <br />Denver, Colorado 80234 www.applegategroup.com Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.