Laserfiche WebLink
To: Susan Burgmaier,DRMS August 31,2011 <br />Prom: Jill Carlson,CGS <br />Subject: Landslide repairs at Seneca II West <br />I visited Seneca II West with you, Sandy Brown,Brian Len of NWCC,and representatives of the mine <br />operator,Peabody Energy/Seneca Coal Company,on July 6 and 7,2011. The purpose of the field <br />meeting was to view and discuss a number of new and recurring landslides within and adjacent to <br />reclaimed areas at the Seneca II West Mine,and to determine what actions,if any,should be taken to <br />repair any slides and unstable areas within the mine permit boundary. Table 1 summarizes the areas <br />discussed. <br />The Seneca II West Mine is underlain by Residuum on the Mesaverde Group(sand, silt,and clay soils), <br />derived from and grading down to weathered,interbedded shale,sandstone and coal beds of the <br />underlying Williams Fork Formation. The layers that compose the Williams Fork Formation were <br />deposited during the late Cretaceous in a fluctuating shoreline environment. The problematic shales and <br />clay soils associated with landslides,unstable slopes,and mud flows in this area were deposited as low- <br />energy marine sediments. <br />Spring of 2011 was a very active season for landslides in Routt County. Infiltration from an unusually <br />large snowpack and heavy precipitation caused soil and weathered rock mass strengths to decrease,and <br />caused increased instability. Numerous new and reactivated landslides,soil slumps and mudflows were <br />observed during routine inspections by DRMS beginning in May 2011. <br />It is important to note that the Seneca II West mine permit boundary contains portions of four landslides <br />mapped by Colton(Colton,R.B. et al, 1975,Preliminary map of landslide deposits,Craig 1°x 2° <br />quadrangle,Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-700,scale <br />1:250000),many unstable slopes,potentially unstable slopes,mud flows,and debris flows/debris fans <br />identified during geologic hazard mapping of Routt County by Allen Miller in approximately 1977, and <br />landslides identified by Madole during surficial geologic mapping. These mapped features predate the <br />mine. Landslides and unstable slopes are a relatively common feature of the natural landscape in the area <br />within and surrounding this mine. <br />During our site visit,we evaluated all of the landslides that you identified within the context of the <br />following questions: <br />1) Would further movement threaten structures such as roads,ponds,stock tanks and drainages that are <br />to remain as permanent features after final bond release? <br />2) Is there evidence of excessive surface or subsurface water,contributing to instability, that can be <br />corrected with a reasonable level of effort? <br />3) Would repairs, such as surface regrading,create more disturbance and surface compaction,thereby by <br />reducing the potential effectiveness of post-repair revegetation efforts, than is justified by the current <br />temporary)unsightliness of any bare landslide surfaces? <br />Please note that the repairs and stabilization measures discussed below have not been analyzed to <br />determine the degree of stability(factor of safety)that will be achieved. Improving surface and <br />subsurface drainage should help reduce,but will not eliminate,the risk of continued or future movement <br />in the event of another high snowfall or high precipitation year. If the state,mine operator or property