My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-16_INSPECTION - C1980007 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2012-02-16_INSPECTION - C1980007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:48:43 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 3:54:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
2/16/2012
Doc Name
Email sent to Operator with Inspection Report sent via Email (Cover sheet)
From
DRMS
To
Kathy Welt
Inspection Date
2/9/2012
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 9, 2012 C -1980 -007 /West Elk Mine JRS <br /> <br /> <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 8 <br />Number of Complete Inspectio ns this Fiscal Year: 3 <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y =Inspected N =Not Ins pected R =Comments Noted V =Violation Issued NA =Not Applicable <br />N - Air Resource Protection <br />R - Availability of Records <br />N - Backfill & Grading <br />N - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste <br />N - Explosives <br />N - Fish & Wildlife <br />R - Hydrologic Balance <br />R - Gen. Complia nce With Mine Plan <br />NA - Other <br />R - Processing Waste <br /> <br />R - Roads <br />N - Reclamation Success <br />N - Revegetation <br />N - Subsidence <br />R - Slides and Other Damage <br />R - Support Facilities On -site <br />R - Signs and Markers <br />N - Support Facilities Not On -site <br />N - Special Categories Of Mining <br />N - Topsoil <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />This was a complete inspection of the West Elk Mine conducted by Jim Stark of the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining and Safety. Robin Schiro of Mountain Coal accompanied me on the entire ins pection , Mike <br />Peacock accompanied us on the inspection of the RPEE area and Kathy Welt was present for the records check . <br />The mine was actively producing shipping coal. They were not generating any refuse, as they are in a good part of <br />the coal seam. The weather was cold and intermittently snowing and the ground was covered in most places with <br />several inches of snow. <br /> <br />Prior to the inspection I met with Kathy Welt, Robin Schiro and Weston Norris to discuss upcoming revisions. <br />These revisions include the technical revision for the ST -02 and RPEE slide mitigation and the permit revision for <br />new permit area and mining south of the current permit boundary. <br /> <br />AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS – Rule 5.02.4(1): <br />- All of the necessary records were available for review in Kathy Welt’s office. The majority of the compliance <br />records are contained in a binder for review. Plea se see the Availability of Records form at the end of this <br />inspection report for more detailed information. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, <br />4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.1 0; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water <br />Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage – Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; <br />Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />- Pond SG -1 was covered with snow but appeared to contain some water. The pond was not discharging at the <br />time of the inspection. The pond embankment appeared to be stable and no erosional problems were noted. The <br />flow meter at the pond outfall was recently replaced. <br />- The mine water treatm ent ponds in Sylvester Gulch contained water but were not discharging. The pond <br />embankments were covered with snow but appeared to be stable. No erosional problems were noted. <br />- Pond MB -3 contained water approximately one foot below the principle spillwa y pipe and was not discharging at <br />the time of the inspection. The embankment was well vegetated and stable and no erosional problems were noted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.