Laserfiche WebLink
Appeal Deciding Officer <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />The environmental analysis adequat ely addresses whether methane flaring or methane capture <br />are reasonable alternatives to the proposed action. The record supports the deciding officer ’s <br />decision . Therefore, I recommend that the Forest Supervisor’s decision be affirmed on this <br />point. <br /> <br /> <br />Ap peal Issue II -C . THE EA FAILS TO ANALYZE CARBON OFFSETS AS A <br />REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE TO REDUCE THE IMPACTS OF THE LEASE’S <br />METHANE POLLUTION. <br /> <br />Carbon offsets are a tested, feasible, and practical alternative to allowing the Elk Creek <br />Mine to vent millions o f cubic feet of methane into the atmosphere every day as a result of the <br />Lease Modification without mitigation or control. <br /> <br />An alternative consenting to Oxbow’s proposed Lease Modification while requiring Oxbow to <br />purchase carbon offsets is consistent wit h the proposed action’s purpose and need. Oxbow would <br />be able to expand its operations in the exact same manner as it proposed. A carbon offset <br />alternative would simply require Oxbow to purchase carbon credits from a reputable vendor. <br /> <br />The Forest Service’s failure to properly analyze the reasonable alternative of carbon offsets <br />violates NEPA’s mandate that an agency study, develop, and describe all reasonable alternatives <br />to the proposed action. See, e.g., Native Ecosystems Council, 428 F.3d at 1245 –47. In addition, <br />the Forest Service violated NEPA’s requirement that an agency provide a reasoned explanation <br />why an alternative was eliminated from detailed analysis. See, e.g., id. at 1245 –46; Wilderness <br />Soc’y, 524 F. Supp. 2d at 1309. <br /> <br />Discussion: Also , s ee a bove discussion under Appeal Issue II , II -A, and II -B . <br /> <br />Emerging policy to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through a cap -and -trade program <br />presents mine managers with an opportunity to explore and develop methane utilization or <br />abatement projects t hat generate value from the monetization of carbon offset credits . P rojects <br />that reduce methane emissions can generate carbon offset credits. <br /> <br />EA, 3.1, Past, Present and Reasonably Foreseeable Actions , starting on page 39 : <br />Elk Creek Mine - <br />The mine has b een operating for 12 years and holds over 6,800 acres of Federal coal <br />leases, pending leases and private reserves. … Mine life is currently projected to last 2 ½ <br />to 3 years (late 2013 to early 2014) based on existing leased reserves. <br /> <br />EA, 3.2, Air Quality, page 46: <br />Preliminary modeling results using EPA’s SCREEN3 air model indicate that methane <br />concentrations from existing methane drainage wells … would still be below the Mine <br />Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) level of 1%. No new methane drainage well s <br />will be needed for mini ng this lease modification area (EA, page 46). <br />