My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-09_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-12-09_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:46:00 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 1:07:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/9/2011
Doc Name
SHPO Response (Emailed)
From
DRMS
To
Ron Thompson
Type & Sequence
MR99
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RC� <br />HISTORY <br />December 6, 2011 <br />Zach T. Trujillo <br />Environmental Protection Intern <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />`k o <br />pE o, a S � Ee �y <br />S o <br />Re: New Elk Mine (Permit No. C- 1981 -012), Minor Revision No. 99 (MR -99), Geotechnical Work to <br />be Performed in the Proposed RDA #1 Expansion Area (CHS #60756) <br />Dear Mr. Trujillo: <br />Thank you for your correspondence dated November 3, 2011 (received by our office on November 8, <br />2011) regarding the subject project. The supplemental survey report and site form (sent and received <br />via electronic -mail on December 2, 2011) has enabled us to complete our evaluation. <br />Following our review of the information provided, we agree that site 5LAl2859 requires additional <br />work (need data for the National Register of Historic Places) to sufficiently assess the archaeological <br />potential of this resource. Assuming this site is avoided by the area of potential effect (APE), we <br />recommend a finding of no historic properties affected for the proposed project. <br />Please remember that the consultation process does involve other consulting parties such as local <br />governments and Tribes, which as stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 are required to be notified of the <br />undertaking. Additional information provided by the local government, Tribes or other consulting <br />parties may cause our office to re- evaluate our comments and recommendations. <br />Should unidentified archaeological resources be discovered in the course of the project, work must be <br />interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register of Historic Places <br />eligibility criteria (36 CFR 60.4) in consultation with our office. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Mark <br />Tobias, Section 106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866 -4674 or mark.tobiasastate.co.us <br />Sincerely, <br />G�J <br />-f4,.-Edward C. Nichols <br />State Historic Preservation Officer <br />ECN /MAT <br />�MG�9M90 OSUOOG3�`f OOdOOG3GQDDOOooOG3 <br />HISTORY COLORADO CENTER 1200 BROADWAY DENVER COLORADO 80203 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.