Laserfiche WebLink
Hernandez, Alysha <br />From: Trujillo, Zach <br />Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:07 <br />To: Hernandez, Alysha <br />Cc: Hernandez, Daniel <br />Subject: FW: New Elk Mine, Minor Revision No <br />Attachments: Revised New Elk Mine MR- 99.pdf <br />AM <br />99, Geotechnical Boring, Revised Letter <br />Hi Alysha, <br />Can you have this correspondence and attachment scanned under New Elk Mine, c- 1981 -012, MR -99. Thanks. <br />Zach <br />From: Tobias, Mark j mailto:Mark.Tobias @state.co.us] <br />Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 20118:15 AM <br />To: Hernandez, Daniel; Trujillo, Zach <br />Subject: New Elk Mine, Minor Revision No. 99, Geotechnical Boring, Revised Letter <br />Dan and Zach, <br />After reviewing the 1991 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between DRMS and SHPO, it appears that consultation <br />is not part of the agreed upon stipulations as set forth in this document. In consideration that consultation is not part of <br />the streamlined Section 106 process for coal permit reviews, I have enclosed a revised and redacted letter for the <br />subject project. I certainly hope that this rectifies the outstanding issue as discussed yesterday. <br />With regards to this agreement document, I hope to meet with the Richard Wilshusen (State Archaeologist) and Dan <br />Corson (Director of Intergovernmental Services) sometime in January to talk about whether they believe the 1991 MOU <br />should be updated. I will let you know the outcome of this internal discussion when it occurs. <br />Mark <br />Mark Tobias <br />Section 106 Compliance Manager <br />Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation <br />Colorado Historical Society <br />1200 Broadway <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />(303) 866 -4674 <br />mark.tobiasnstate.co.us <br />