My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-04-03_REPORT - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2012-04-03_REPORT - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 8:31:39 AM
Creation date
4/4/2012 7:33:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/3/2012
Doc Name
2011 Annual Reclamation Report Review
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Annual Report Year
2011
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Don Macdonald; CEC <br />2011; ARR Review <br />April 3, 2012 <br />Mass Balance <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />CEC submits results of ash disposal with the ARR. The volume of ash placed in the disposal area, and the results <br />on the chemical analysis sample of bottom ash and flyash are included with the report. In 2011, CEC reports that <br />36,961 tons of mixed flyash and bottom ash were disposed of in the B Pit at the Keenesburg Strip Mine. Two <br />samples, one flyash sample and one bottom ash sample, were analyzed for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching <br />Procedure (TCLP). Results of the bottom ash sample recorded Barium at 2.1 mg /L and 1.2mg /L for flyash. Per <br />the laboratory report in the ARR, the reporting limit for Barium is 1.0 for the reported method, and the Maximum <br />Contaminant Level for Barium is 100 mg /L. The measured value for Barium for the bottom ash and flyash <br />sample is not identified as a concern. All other parameters analyzed for the bottom ash and flyash samples were <br />below the reporting limits for the associated analyses. <br />Review of the reported spoil mass balance (page 107) revealed one discrepancy. According to the 2010 ARR, the <br />remaining long -term spoil on the site was 340,895 bank cubic yards (BCY). The 2011 ARR indicated 9,563 BCY <br />were used primarily for cover for the ash disposal area. Given this, only 331,332BCY should be remaining at the <br />site as of the end of 2011. However, the report indicated 331,832 BCY remain. There is a discrepancy of 500 <br />BCY. Please see the summary table below: <br />Description <br />Value <br />Units <br />Long -term spoil remaining on site - per <br />2010 ARR <br />340,895 <br />BCY <br />Spoil used for cover in 2011 — per 2011 <br />ARR <br />9,563 <br />BCY <br />Remainder <br />331,332 <br />BCY <br />Long -term spoil remaining on site - per <br />2011 ARR <br />331,832 <br />BCY <br />"Please correct this discrepancy. <br />Mapping <br />The contours on the Reclamation Contour and Drainage Plan Map (Appendix Q -1) submitted with the 2011 ARR <br />match the contours from the previous contour map Appendix Q -1 from the 2010 ARR with minor exceptions. Pit <br />B topography has changed as ash has been disposed in the pit. Likewise, minor changes in the long -term spoil <br />pile topography are noted due to the extraction of this material for cover of the ash disposal area. <br />Vegetation Monitoring Review; 2011 <br />CEC hired Savage and Savage, Inc. to conduct vegetation monitoring on Reclamation Areas (RA) 29, 30 and 31. <br />Vegetation monitoring occurred in August of 2011. RA 29 is 8.10 acres in size and was seeded in the autumn of <br />2003. RA 30 is 9.68 acres in size and was seeded in November 2006. RA 31 is 11.92 acres in size and was <br />seeded in the fall of 2009. Vegetation cover, total herbaceous production and species composition were sampled. <br />These parameters were sampled using the approved methods described in the permit. <br />The reported total mean vegetative cover for each of the Reclamation Areas included contributions of a noxious <br />weed species (Bromus tectorum, Cheatgrass) and several annual species. Cheatgrass is considered a noxious <br />weed on the State Noxious Weed list and the Weld County Noxious Weed list. Although, CEC is not requesting <br />bond release on these parcels, the Division does not consider noxious weeds as contributing to reclamation <br />success. Also, the Division only allows a maximum of 10% relative cover contributions from annual and biennial <br />species to count toward revegetation success. Annual or biennial cover in excess of this threshold should be <br />deleted from the reclaimed area data prior to success comparisons. Given these two issues, the Division <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.