Laserfiche WebLink
Don Macdonald; CEC <br />2011; ARR Review <br />April 3, 2012 <br />Mass Balance <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />CEC submits results of ash disposal with the ARR. The volume of ash placed in the disposal area, and the results <br />on the chemical analysis sample of bottom ash and flyash are included with the report. In 2011, CEC reports that <br />36,961 tons of mixed flyash and bottom ash were disposed of in the B Pit at the Keenesburg Strip Mine. Two <br />samples, one flyash sample and one bottom ash sample, were analyzed for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching <br />Procedure (TCLP). Results of the bottom ash sample recorded Barium at 2.1 mg /L and 1.2mg /L for flyash. Per <br />the laboratory report in the ARR, the reporting limit for Barium is 1.0 for the reported method, and the Maximum <br />Contaminant Level for Barium is 100 mg /L. The measured value for Barium for the bottom ash and flyash <br />sample is not identified as a concern. All other parameters analyzed for the bottom ash and flyash samples were <br />below the reporting limits for the associated analyses. <br />Review of the reported spoil mass balance (page 107) revealed one discrepancy. According to the 2010 ARR, the <br />remaining long -term spoil on the site was 340,895 bank cubic yards (BCY). The 2011 ARR indicated 9,563 BCY <br />were used primarily for cover for the ash disposal area. Given this, only 331,332BCY should be remaining at the <br />site as of the end of 2011. However, the report indicated 331,832 BCY remain. There is a discrepancy of 500 <br />BCY. Please see the summary table below: <br />Description <br />Value <br />Units <br />Long -term spoil remaining on site - per <br />2010 ARR <br />340,895 <br />BCY <br />Spoil used for cover in 2011 — per 2011 <br />ARR <br />9,563 <br />BCY <br />Remainder <br />331,332 <br />BCY <br />Long -term spoil remaining on site - per <br />2011 ARR <br />331,832 <br />BCY <br />"Please correct this discrepancy. <br />Mapping <br />The contours on the Reclamation Contour and Drainage Plan Map (Appendix Q -1) submitted with the 2011 ARR <br />match the contours from the previous contour map Appendix Q -1 from the 2010 ARR with minor exceptions. Pit <br />B topography has changed as ash has been disposed in the pit. Likewise, minor changes in the long -term spoil <br />pile topography are noted due to the extraction of this material for cover of the ash disposal area. <br />Vegetation Monitoring Review; 2011 <br />CEC hired Savage and Savage, Inc. to conduct vegetation monitoring on Reclamation Areas (RA) 29, 30 and 31. <br />Vegetation monitoring occurred in August of 2011. RA 29 is 8.10 acres in size and was seeded in the autumn of <br />2003. RA 30 is 9.68 acres in size and was seeded in November 2006. RA 31 is 11.92 acres in size and was <br />seeded in the fall of 2009. Vegetation cover, total herbaceous production and species composition were sampled. <br />These parameters were sampled using the approved methods described in the permit. <br />The reported total mean vegetative cover for each of the Reclamation Areas included contributions of a noxious <br />weed species (Bromus tectorum, Cheatgrass) and several annual species. Cheatgrass is considered a noxious <br />weed on the State Noxious Weed list and the Weld County Noxious Weed list. Although, CEC is not requesting <br />bond release on these parcels, the Division does not consider noxious weeds as contributing to reclamation <br />success. Also, the Division only allows a maximum of 10% relative cover contributions from annual and biennial <br />species to count toward revegetation success. Annual or biennial cover in excess of this threshold should be <br />deleted from the reclaimed area data prior to success comparisons. Given these two issues, the Division <br />