My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-15_REVISION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2011-12-15_REVISION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:46:07 PM
Creation date
4/3/2012 1:34:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/15/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review (Emailed)
From
Jill Carlson
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR76
Media Type
d
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Susan Burgmaier, DRMS December 9, 2011 <br />From: Jill Carlson, CGS <br />Subject: Review of TR -76, landslide repairs at Seneca II West, and notes from September 28; <br />2011 site visit <br />I have reviewed Attachment 20 -E, "Summary Report Identifying Unstable Areas within the 11 -W <br />Disturbance Boundary" of technical revision TR 76 (Seneca Coal Company, November 2011). SCC <br />states (page 20-E-1) "This proposed plan is based on a report prepared by Jill Carlson (CGS)." Our <br />Seneca II -W landslide work during this past summer involved three site visits to observe surface <br />conditions and discuss which of the landslides may- impact structures or areas outside permit boundaries <br />or have long -term impacts on final reclamation. <br />Our field observations and field discussions with the mine operator and geotechnical consultant Qulh 6 -7; <br />2011) were oriented toward improving drainage and revegetation, thereby- improving short term stability, <br />However, CGS did not perform any quantitative investigations or analyses and recommends that such <br />work is needed to ensure long-term stability. The technical revision did not include this information, <br />which includes: <br />• Characterization of slope geometiN and failure surface(s) <br />• Quantitative analysis of driving or shearing forces acting on the slide mass due to water and <br />gravity <br />• Quantitative determination of shear strength values (resisting forces due to cohesion and friction) <br />along the failure surface <br />• Analysis of various stabilization strategies to determine what measures; or combination of <br />measures, would be required to achieve the desired long - term factor of safety. <br />Based on the information submitted, I have the following comments: <br />Oil Well Access Road Slump. This slump should be monitored. Additional stabilization measures; <br />possible including a larger buttress /retaining wall, may be needed if additional movement is observed. <br />Pump House Slide. Monitor. <br />Pit Ramp Slide. Remediation plan outlined in TR -76 is consistent with field discussions <br />Pond 016 Slide Area. Work associated with TR -73 is in progress. Observations of high artesian <br />pressures in several of the wells at the base of the PM -2A drainage basin indicate that high pore water <br />pressures in some strata may be contributing to decreased stability. Monitor. <br />Pond 017 /Stock Tank T -25 Area. Remediation plan outlined in TR -76 is consistent with field <br />discussions. <br />Pond 006 Area Slumps. Monitor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.