My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-04-02_REPORT - C1994082 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2012-04-02_REPORT - C1994082 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:55:47 PM
Creation date
4/3/2012 8:26:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/2/2012
Doc Name
2011 Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Woody Plant Density <br />In the 2007 reclamation area, the 2009 - observed woody plant density level of 1420.5 stems per <br />acre increased to 3812.2 stems per acre in 2011, which is very encouraging for such young <br />revegetation. Comprising this total are big sagebrush, Saskatoon serviceberry, snowberry, and <br />aspen. <br />Species Diversity and Composition <br />When the 2007 reclamation was only two years old in 2009, there was approximately two times <br />as much relative cover by annuals and biennials (ESCO 2010) compared to the four year old data <br />collected in 2011. <br />The distribution of species density by lifeform (Figure 4) shows that the 2007 Reclaimed Areas <br />are more similar to the reference areas than would appear to be the case from the lifeform <br />distribution of relative cover (Figure 5). This shows that the basic components of the original <br />ecosystem have indeed been returned and that it is a matter of relative proportions of species <br />(and age or community successional status) that separates the reclaimed from the native <br />vegetation. Perhaps the largest difference with regard to species density is in the native <br />perennial forbs category, where native areas (at least the most extensive native types of <br />Mountain Brush and Sagebrush) tend to have half again to twice as many species of native <br />perennial forbs per 100 sq.m than the four year old 2007 reclaimed areas. Data for total native <br />species density in the 2007 reclamation areas was 24.7 species per 100 sq.m. in 2011, nearly the <br />same as the 24.9 species per 100 sq.m. observed in 2009. Average total species density per 100 <br />sq.m. in the 2007 reclaimed areas did not exceed any of the reference areas (Figure 4). <br />However, in the 1500 sq.m. sampled in 2011, a total of 42 native species were encountered. This <br />well exceeds the average number of native species per 100 sq.m. in the various reference areas <br />which ranges from 22 to 38 species per 100 sq.m. (see Table B -2). Within the first five random <br />samples in the reclaimed area (i.e. with a random 500 sq.m.), 30 native species were <br />encountered. Assuming that the development of species richness / diversity is a progressive <br />matter, the existence of approximately equal level of richness that exists in 100 sq.m. of most of <br />the reference sites, shows very favorable progress. <br />Sample Adequacy <br />A summary of sample adequacy calculations for the parameters of cover, herbaceous production, <br />and woody plant density is presented in Table C -4. As can be seen in this table, the data sets for <br />cover for the 2007 reclaimed and mountain brush reference areas did not achieve sample <br />adequacy. The data sets for production collected in the reclaimed and the reference areas did <br />not achieve sample adequacy as well. Note that no formal testing for Phase III bond release <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.