My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 1:32:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/8/2002
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT, PART 3
From
HABITAT MGMT
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
natural sagebrush stand establishment. This study evaluated stands of the Wyoming, <br />basin (vaseyanna), and mountain (tridentata) subspecies from locations thorough out <br />Wyoming. Significant findings include stands are generally even -aged and establishment <br />is episodic. Mean stand ages of Wyoming big sagebrush in northeast and central <br />Wyoming are approximately 26 to 32 years. This is 3 to 4 times older than the mean fire- <br />free interval of 8 years for these areas. Irregular pulses of recruitment appear to be <br />characteristic of big sagebrush stands in Wyoming. <br />This study further found that above average December and January precipitation <br />following initial establishment of Wyoming big sagebrush seedlings was a common <br />occurrence associated with stand establishment. It would appear that the deeper snow <br />cover associated with the above- average precipitation at that time of year provides <br />protection from winter desiccation as well as additional soil moisture during the spring <br />growing season. For basin big sagebrush, there was higher recruitment in those years <br />with higher than average June precipitation during the first growing season, followed by <br />higher than average precipitation in March, May and June of the second growing season. <br />Mountain big sagebrush did not follow this pattern as precipitation in the higher <br />mountain environments means lower temperatures, not conducive to germination and <br />growth at those times of the year. <br />Perryman et al. (1999) further found that big sagebrush stand age might be <br />estimated by stem diameter measurements of the larger plants within the stand with <br />reasonable accuracy. They obtained good correlation with approximately 1 mm of <br />diameter per year. <br />A second study, The Influence of Post - harvest and Pre - planting Seed Treatment <br />on Sagebrush Seedling Vigor, was initiated in 1993 (Booth et al. 1996). Analyses were <br />performed on big sagebrush seeds collected from several locations during the late winter. <br />Processing through a 48 -inch commercial debearder did not appear to reduce seed <br />quality. Moisture percentages in the seed ranged from 2.3 to 9.0% and seed weights <br />ranged from 0.022 to 0.032 g/100 seeds. Germination percentages were highest, and <br />germination most rapid, from the heavier seeds. <br />This study also evaluated moisture uptake (hydration) by big sagebrush seed in <br />storage during a 15 -day period at 2 °, 5 °, 10 °, and 15 °C. Hydration occurred slowly at the <br />cooler temperatures while the maximum rate of hydration occurred at 10 °C. The <br />differences in hydration rates did not appear to influence germination or seedling vigor in <br />laboratory tests. <br />Big sagebrush seeds, when exposed to seven water potentials ranging from 0.00 to <br />—1.5 MPa, exhibited greatest germination at 0.00 Mpa. The authors also observed that <br />the pericarp reduces water uptake and that pericarp removal enhanced germination <br />between —0.50 and —1.00 Mpa. Booth et al. (1996) recommended, however, not to <br />remove the pericarp, as they believed it is important in retaining seed viability in the soil <br />until more favorable soil moisture conditions occur. They implied normal seed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.