My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 1:32:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/8/2002
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT, PART 3
From
HABITAT MGMT
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2000 Billings Land Reclamation Symposium <br />SAGEBRUSH AND MINE RECLAMATION: WHAT'S NEEDED FROM HERE? <br />Larry H. Kleinman' and Timothy C. Richmond <br />ABSTRACT <br />The Wyoming Environmental Quality Act requires coal mines to include shrubs in the <br />reclamation revegetation species mix and further specifies planting patterns and density <br />required for full reclamation bond release. Wyoming big sagebrush ( tridentata <br />ssp. wyomingensis) is a principal shrub component in many of the vegetative <br />communities found in the coal mining districts of Wyoming and elsewhere in the western <br />United States. Efforts to establish Wyoming big sagebrush on reclaimed areas by the <br />coal mining companies in Wyoming have met with mixed success. The University of <br />Wyoming, through its Abandoned Coal Mine Lands Research Program funded by the <br />Abandoned Mine Land Program of the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, <br />has sponsored several research projects beginning in 1993 to better understand the <br />requirements of Wyoming big sagebrush revegetation and to find more cost effective and <br />dependable methodologies for meeting the legislative and regulatory requirements. The <br />research to date has been less than conclusive; seed is germinating, but seedlings seldom <br />reach a mature, dominant, or co- dominant position on reclaimed sites. One study found <br />natural sagebrush stands are even -aged, suggesting only certain, unique climatic or <br />weather conditions may be a requisite for stand establishment, or perhaps some <br />catastrophic event such as fire, may be required. Further research is needed to find <br />economic methods for Wyoming big sagebrush establishment and survival. Current <br />seeding methodologies may add as much as five cents to the cost of producing one ton of <br />coal. Coal contracts are won or lost by as little as five cents subtracted or added to the <br />cost per ton of coal. What are the economic cut -offs for "transplanting and seeding" <br />What types of cultural practices will ensure seed germination and seedling survival each <br />year, instead of just when climatic conditions are ideal? Cultural practices may include, <br />but are not limited to soil chemical and physical characteristics , surface manipulation, <br />mulches, cover crops and heavy livestock grazing. This information is needed before the <br />mining industry can satisfy the regulatory requirements in a cost - effective manner. <br />Additional Key Words: shrubs, revegetation, regeneration <br />1. Reclamation Manager, Kiewit Mining Group, Black Butte coal Company, Point of <br />Rocks, Wyoming. <br />2. Project Officer, Abandoned Mine Land Division, Wyoming Department of <br />Environmental Quality, Cheyenne, Wyoming. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.