Laserfiche WebLink
d#t! Of rooting zone below <br />mI my its a reservoir for nutrients <br />}1!__ productive undisturbed <br />Salt Willi be suitable for extensive root <br />end _water movement and retention. <br />aubsoll characteristics that develop <br />ormation do not have as marked an ef <br />11011 productivity as do the characteristics <br />s011. Subsoil replacement serves two pur- <br />ta Was discussed by Omodt et al. (1975) and <br />- non and Schroer (1980). First, if the underlying <br />I Is = coarse- textured with a low water - holding <br />Ity, finer-textured second lift materials will in- <br />aae the available water - holding capacity within <br />root - Zone. Second, If the underlying spoil has <br />=undesirable properties for plant growth, replaced <br />aubsoll serves as a buffer by placing the undesirable <br />spoil materials below the root zone. If the properties <br />- Of the underlying spoil are such that it is a favorable <br />plant growth material, it can serve as the lower por- <br />tion Of the root zone. The depth of subsoil, or second <br />ilft, that must be replaced to restore optimum pro- <br />ductive levels therefore depends upon the character- <br />istics of the underlying spoil. <br />Water - holding capacity: <br />The water - holding capacity of a soil is a fixed pro- <br />perty which is dependent primarily upon texture and <br />bulk density. While the water - holding capacity can <br />be slightly altered by changes in organic matter and <br />degree of aggregation, coarse - textured soils will <br />always be more droughty than finer - textured soils. <br />The water - holding capacity of reclaimed soils can be <br />Improved by selective placement of medium and <br />flne - textured materials in the root zone or by increas- <br />ing the effective depth of the root zone when <br />available second lift materials are coarse - textured. <br />When sandy loam topsoil was placed over <br />moderately sodlic clay loam spoil in the Knife River <br />experiment (Tables 4 and 5), yields of both wheat and <br />corn after six years tended to be higher when 12 <br />inches of topsoil was replaced than when 24 inches <br />was replaced. This is attributed to the higher water - <br />holding capacity when the top 2 feet of the root zone <br />consisted of 12 Inches of sandy loam plus 12 inches <br />Of clay loam Instead of 24 inches of sandy loam. <br />Higher yields were Initially obtained with 24 inches <br />of topsoil, probably because moisture levels in the <br />spoil were low Immediately after reclamation. In the <br />Stanton wedge experiment (Table 12), yields at total <br />soil depths of 28 and 36 inches were consistently <br />higher with 8 inches of sandy loam topsoil than with <br />24 inches; the underlying subsoil was clay loam in <br />texture. The yield data for this experiment (Tables 7, <br />0, 9, and 10) suggest that about another foot of sub - <br />_aOli Was needed for optimum yields with 24 inches <br />=than with 8 Inches of sandy loam topsoil. <br />Subsoil materials of different texture were com- <br />pared In the double wedge experiment at Zap (Figure <br />17 <br />5 and Table 14), interpretation of differences due to <br />subsoil characteristics are complicated by the in- <br />teracting effects of slope, aspect, and soil and crop <br />management. Wheat yields were higher on the fine - <br />textured subsoil, irrespective of soluble salt and <br />sodicity levels (Table 14); crested wheatgrass yields <br />followed the same trend in 1978 when the highest <br />yields were obtained, but when moisture was more <br />limiting (1979 and 1981), yields were highest on the <br />coarse- textured subsoil which was also lowest in <br />soluble salts and sodium. In general, these results <br />are consistent with the effects of topsoil texture <br />discussed previously for the Knife River and Stanton <br />experiments. <br />When the overburden was nonsaline and non - <br />sodic, as in the Falkirk trench plots, replacement of <br />27 inches of loam topsoil over gravelly loamy sand <br />was not sufficient for optimum yields (Table 16). The <br />replacement of clay loam subsoil over gravelly loamy <br />sand resulting in a total soil depth of 5 feet was pro- <br />bably more than adequate for optimum yields. Yields <br />with 27 inches of topsoil without subsoil were about <br />85 percent of maximum yields in this experiment and <br />by interpolation suggest that at least 32 to 35 inches <br />of medium or fine - textured materials would be need- <br />ed for optimum yields over gravelly loamy sand. <br />When the texture of the overburden was silty clay <br />loam or clay loam, optimum yields were obtained <br />with 18 or 27 inches of topsoil. Throughout this ex- <br />periment, yields tended to increase as topsoil <br />depths increased from 9 to 27 inches, although yield <br />differences between the 18 and 27 inch depths were <br />minimal. Relative yield differences between topsoil <br />depths tended to decrease as the experiment pro- <br />gressed, and differences due to topsoil depths <br />would be expected to decrease as structure and root <br />channels were formed in the overburden material. <br />These results emphasize the importance of the <br />water - holding capacity of the upper portion of the <br />root zone and show that spoil materials which have <br />favorable chemical and physical characteristics are <br />acceptable for the lower portion of the root zone. <br />However, these spoil materials have not been sub- <br />jected to the weathering processes which take place <br />in the lower horizons during soil development. <br />Yields immediately after soil replacement in the <br />Knife River (Table 4) and Falkirk (Table 16) ex- <br />periments suggest that the development of <br />favorable conditions for plant root development may <br />require several years. Conversely, yields on the <br />reclaimed soils at Beulah and Center (Table 19) tend- <br />ed to approach yields on similar undisturbed soils <br />after two or three years. Until more definitive data <br />are available concerning the development of <br />favorable characteristics for root growth in spoil <br />materials, replacement of at least 1 foot of subsoil, <br />in addition to 1 foot of topsoil, over good quality <br />spoil materials seems to be desirable unless proper- <br />ties of the subsoil indicate that it is less desirable <br />for plant growth than the underlying spoil. <br />