My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 1:32:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/8/2002
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT, PART 3
From
HABITAT MGMT
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY <br />Vegetation diversity, both within and among plant communities, <br />is often an important consideration in reclamation of mined lands in <br />the Northern Great Plains. The specific nature of topsoil application <br />and management methods can be expected to directly influence diversity <br />as well as other aspects of vegetation on mined lands. <br />Several topsoil application /management practices may affect diver- <br />sity within mined land plant communities. Existing evidence strongly <br />supports the beneficiality of rapid reapplication of topsoil following <br />salvage and relatively limited use of fertilization to increased intra- <br />plant community diversity. Multiple lift topsoiling and supplemental <br />fresh soil top- dressing may have some potential to increase diversity; <br />however, further evaluation is needed to substantiate /disprove the <br />actual utility of these approaches. The relationship of topsoil appli- <br />cation depth to intra - community diversity is not fully understood, has <br />proven rather inconsistent, and consequently requires further research <br />on a site /vegetation- specific basis. However, some research has demon- <br />strated higher plant community diversity under shallower depths of <br />reapplied topsoil. <br />Two topsoiling strategies were hypothesized to have potential for <br />creation of increased edaphic heterogeneity and hence greater diver- <br />sity among different plant community types on mined lands: varied top- <br />soil depths on different sites and selective soil type salvage /deposi- <br />tion. Both approaches, however, require field research and application <br />with respect to practicability and effectiveness before firm recommenda- <br />tions on utility can be made. <br />A strong implication from a number of principles discussed is that <br />in certain instances topsoil practices to enhance vegetation diversity <br />may not be identical to practices to maximize absolute, total producti- <br />vity. Optimum diversity within plant communities has sometimes occurred <br />under fertilization regimes, topsoil depths and /or mulching regimes <br />below those necessary to achieve maximum productivity. Increased diver- <br />sity among plant community types achieved via varied topsoil depth or <br />selective topsoil type handling approaches, if such ultimately do prove <br />utilitarian, could also conceivably be at the expense of total, area - <br />wide productivity. Therefore, a tacit acceptance of some degree of <br />lower overall productivity may sometimes be necessary, at least <br />initially, for increased vegetation diversity on mined lands. Whether <br />or not this price is "too high" to pay will then depend upon site - <br />specific reclamation goals. <br />267 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.