My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 1:31:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/8/2002
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT, PART 2
From
HABITAT MGMT
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A research study aimed at assessing the role of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens ssp. <br />aptera) as a "pioneer" plant to enhance the later establishment of big sagebrush and to evaluate the <br />role of this plant in excluding big sagebrush when seeded at rates in excess of 2.2 kg PLS ha' was <br />reported by Schuman and Booth (1998). Grass competition was not evaluated in this study; hence, <br />the only herbaceous plant competition that existed was from plants that became established <br />naturally through the topsoil seedbank or other means of recruitment. The entire study area had a <br />stubble mulch. They found that fourwing saltbush neither improved nor restricted sagebrush <br />establishment; however, they did report greater total shrub densities where fourwing saltbush was <br />over - seeded a year later with big sagebrush. Big sagebrush represented 42% of the shrub density <br />and the seeding strategy produced about 10,000 more total shrub seedlings per hectare than other <br />seeding strategies. Gores (1995), Booth et al. (1999), and Olson et al. (2000) also reported that <br />shrub densities were greater when more than one shrub species is included in the reclamation seed <br />mixture. <br />Schuman et al. (1998) and Schuman and Booth (1998) showed that big sagebrush seed <br />maintains its viability for much longer than thought (Young and Evans 1989) because new <br />seedlings were noted 3 -5 years after the initial seeding of big sagebrush in the research they <br />reported. Wyoming big sagebrush has been shown to have some seed dormancy (McDonough and <br />Harniss 1974, Booth et al. 1997); therefore, Schuman et al. (1998) and Schuman and Booth <br />(1998) believe that continued germination and establishment of big sagebrush for several years <br />was related to seed dormancy, the continual development of "safe sites" for seed germination and <br />establishment (Harper 1977) and improved climatic conditions (precipitation and temperature) in <br />subsequent years. <br />Research has also shown that seeding a mixture of shrub species also results in greater <br />overall density, species diversity, and structural diversity than is achieved by a single shrub species <br />(Gores 1995, Booth et al. 1999 and Olson et al. 2000). Gores (1995) and Olson et al. (2000) also <br />reported that sites seeded to several shrub species resulted in higher diversity indices of reclaimed <br />sites compared to those where only fourwing saltbush was seeded (Figure 3). Greater species and <br />structural diversity greatly enhance wildlife habitat quality. <br />Conclusions /Summary <br />Research reviewed in this paper has answered many questions related to establishment of <br />Wyoming big sagebrush on mined lands; however, not all of the issues /concerns have been fully <br />addressed. Current research is assessing the effects of sagebrush seeding rates and multiple levels <br />of grass competition on sagebrush establishment should further aid in defining and developing a <br />big sagebrush establishment technology. The fact that big sagebrush has exhibited some seed <br />dormancy and has been shown to retain seed viability for several years after being seeded greatly <br />increases the probability of a good "precipitation and temperature year" occurring while the seed is <br />still viable. This fact alone may make it desirable to seed big sagebrush at a higher rate than <br />previously recommended to ensure an adequate seed bank for germination and establishment over <br />several years. Even though big sagebrush seed is relatively expensive, this cost would be much <br />lower than having to mobilize equipment and a contractor a second year to ensure adequate and <br />desired sagebrush densities are achieved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.