Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />Xerophytic shrubs are a significant component of rangelands throughout much of the <br />arid/semiarid West and provide many benefits to the function and utility of rangeland ecosystems <br />(McKell and Goodin 1973). Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) is <br />one of the most widely distributed and adapted shrub species in Wyoming and the region (Beetle <br />and Johnson 1982). However, its re- establishment on mined lands has generally proven difficult <br />because of low seedling vigor, an inability to compete with herbaceous species, and altered <br />edaphic conditions (Harniss and McDonough 1976, Young and Evans 1989, Schuman et al. <br />1998). Reduced levels of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) in the disturbed soils have also been <br />postulated as a factor limiting the success of re- establishment of big sagebrush on disturbed lands <br />(Call and McKell 1982, Stahl et al. 1988). Arbuscular mycorrhizae can improve the host plant's <br />ability to extract nutrients and water from soil (Stahl et al. 1988). Indirect evidence has indicated <br />that water availability is one of the key factors involved in big sagebrush seedling establishment <br />success (Jones 1991). Allen (1984) reported that sagebrush is particularly dependent upon <br />mycorrhizal symbiosis to reach full growth potential. Use of "pioneer" plants to improve soil <br />conditions, including mycorrhizal levels, of disturbed lands for later seral species has also been <br />postulated as a means to enhance re- establishment of big sagebrush (Booth 1985, Meyer 1990). It <br />is evident from this brief review of the literature that much additional information was needed to <br />enhance our understanding of big sagebrush seedbed ecology and to develop a seeding technology <br />that would result in successful re- establishment of this species. <br />Recent Findings <br />Schuman and Booth (1998), Stahl et al. (1998), Schuman et al. (1998), and Booth et al. <br />(1999) reported on recent research evaluating the effects of historic reclamation practices, soil <br />management, mulching, competition, and arbuscular mycorrhizal on big sagebrush establishment. <br />Schuman and Booth (1998) and Schuman et al. (1998) in a study to evaluate the effect of topsoil <br />management (stockpiling vs direct placement), mulching (stubble, surface, stubble + surface, and <br />no mulch), and competition ( three grass seeding rates) found that all three variables affected big <br />sagebrush seedling establishment in an interactive manner. Sagebrush seedling densities responded <br />differently to the treatments during the first year (1992) after seeding and the following spring than <br />they did in the fall of 1993 and 1994 (Table 1 -3). The largest increase in sagebrush seedlings were <br />observed between the spring 1993 and fall 1993 due to the wet and cool conditions during that <br />period. Big sagebrush seedling densities observed in 1992 on the direct placed topsoil -no <br />competition - mulched treatments (Table 1) exceeded the shrub density standard ( 1 shrub m <br />adopted in Wyoming (Federal Register 1996). If we use Kriger et al. (1987) findings that 32% of <br />the big sagebrush established the first year will survive after 11 years we still have adequate <br />seedling densities for the stubble and surface mulch treatments to achieve this standard. This <br />emphasizes the importance of good cultural practices in establishing big sagebrush since 1992 was <br />a below <br />