|
small percentage of inhibitory soil properties to occur in the reclamation based on the
<br />distribution of native soil properties.
<br />3. Use multiple factors rather than single factors to determine hazard associated with marginal
<br />soil chemistry components such as SAR and selenium
<br />4. Promote variable rather than uniform topdressing replacement in order to resemble premine
<br />soil landscapes.
<br />REFERENCES
<br />Barth, R.C. and B.K. Martin. 1984. Soil depth requirements for vegetation of surface -mined areas in Wyoming,
<br />Montana and North Dakota. JEQ 13:399 -404.
<br />Biondini, M.E., and E.F. Redente. 1986. Interactive effect of stimulus and stress on plant community diversity in
<br />reclaimed lands. Reclamation & Reveg. Res. 4:211 -222.
<br />Buchanan, B., T Ramsey and D. Romig. 1999. Building a foundation for diversity. Paper presented at the OSM
<br />Interactive Forum: Approaching bond release. Sept. 1999. Flagstaff, AZ.
<br />DePuit, E. J. 1984. Potential topsoiling strategies for enhancement of vegetation diversity on mined lands. In F.F.
<br />Munshower and S.E. Fischer (eds.) Third Biennial Symp. on Surface Coal Mine Reclamation on the Great Plains.
<br />Billings, MT
<br />Franco- Vizcaino, E., R. Graham and E. Alexander. 1993. Plant species diversity and chemical properties of soils in
<br />the central desert of Baja California, Mexico. Soil Sci 155:406 -416.
<br />Gates, D.H., L.A. Stoddart and C.W. Cook. 1956. Soil as a factor influencing plant distribution on salt deserts of
<br />Utah. Ecol. Mono. 26:155 -175.
<br />Keck, T.J. and J.M. Wraith. 1996. Variations among different reclamation materials ar Western Energy's Rosebud
<br />Mine. In F.F. Munshower and S.E. Fischer (eds.) Planning, Rehabilitation and Treatment of Disturbed Lands, 7th
<br />Billings Symp., Billings, MT.
<br />Keck, T.J. W.F. Quimby and G.A. Nielsen. 1993. Spatial distribution of soil attributes on reconstructed minesoils.
<br />Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:782 -786.
<br />Merrill, S.D., R.F. Ries and J.D. Power. 1998. Subsoil characteristics and landscape position affect productivity of
<br />reconstructed mine soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62:263 -271.
<br />Merrill, SD., S.J. Smith and J.D. Power. 1985. Effect of disturbed soil thickness on soil water use and movement
<br />under perennial grass. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:196 -202.
<br />Munk, L.P. 1996. Sodicity and salinity in mined land reclamation. In F.F. Munshower and S.E. Fischer (eds.)
<br />Planning, Rehabilitation and Treatment of Disturbed Lands, 7 Billings Symp., Billings, MT.
<br />Munk, L.P., D.E. Romig, and M.D. Coates. 1999. Spoil sodicity standards: Reconciling science and regulation. In
<br />Proc. Am. Soc. Surface Mining Reclamation 16 Annual Mtg. Scotsdale, AZ.
<br />Power, J.D., F.M. Sandoval, R.F. Ries and S.D. Merrill. 1981. Effect of topsoil and subsoil thickness on soil water
<br />content and crop production on a disturbed soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:124 -129.
<br />Prodgers, R.A. and T.J. Keck. 1996. Vegetation diversity concepts and strategies for reclamation. In F.F.
<br />Munshower and S.E. Fischer (eds.) Planning, Rehabilitation and Treatment of Disturbed Lands, 7 Billings
<br />Symp., Billings, MT.
<br />Schafer, W.M. 1979 Variability of minesoils and natural soils in SE Montana. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:1207 -1212.
<br />Sorenson, T. 1948. A method for establishing groups of equal amplitude. 1. Plant sociology based on similarity of
<br />species content. Det. Kong. Danske Vidensk. Selsk Biol. Skr. 5:1 -24.
<br />Stark, J.M., and E.F. Redente. 1985. Soil -plant diversity relationships on a disturbed site in northwestern Colorado.
<br />Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:1028 -1034.
<br />Wallace, A., E.M. Romney and V.Q. Hale. 1973. Sodium relations in desert plants: 1. Cation contents of some plant
<br />species from the Mojave and Great Basin deserts. Soil Sci. 115:284 -287.
<br />
|