Laserfiche WebLink
ably resulted from the improved soil phys- <br />ical characteristics brought about by the <br />. deep rooting of the barley - reflected by <br />the infiltration data discussed later. We al- <br />so attributed some of the increased produc- <br />tion on the stubble plots to greater seedling <br />establishment (6). <br />Production of nonseeded species de- <br />creased as topsoil depth increased on the <br />stubble plots; however, little change oc- <br />curred on the straw - mulched plots. Non- <br />seeded species' production was significant- <br />ly lower on the stubble plots than on the <br />straw - mulched plots at the 400- and <br />600 -mm topsoil depths -the opposite of <br />planted species' production. The greater <br />nonseeded species' production on the <br />straw - mulched plots probably resulted <br />from the poorer grass establishment. This <br />enabled weeds and other invading native <br />species to become established in the open <br />areas between the grass. Nonseeded species <br />also competed with the seeded species for <br />water and plant nutrients. Desirable, in- <br />vading native species only accounted for a <br />small percentage of the nonseeded species' <br />production; however, these invading <br />species would be important in overall plant <br />community diversity. <br />Many of the trends observed in the seed- <br />ed species' production on the stubble - <br />mulched plots were similar to the produc- <br />tion of the barley used in establishing the <br />stubble mulch. Barley production was 743, <br />878, 1,204, and 1,473 kg ha'' for the 0 -, <br />200 -, 400 -, and 600 -mm topsoil depths, re- <br />spectively. <br />Table 3 shows the effect of topsoil depth <br />on the production of seeded and nonseeded <br />species. Seeded species' production in- <br />creased gradually over the 4 years with no <br />topsoil, indicating a general improvement <br />in spoil characteristics for plant growth. <br />This trend, which would be expected as the <br />vegetative community develops, was gen- <br />erally true at all topsoil depths. However, <br />it was not always statistically significant. <br />Seeded species' production at the 400 - <br />and 600 -mm topsoil depths was signifi- <br />cantly higher in all 4 years. We attributed <br />the greater production in 1981 and 1982 <br />partially to greater precipitation than in <br />the 2 previous years (Table 4). <br />Nonseeded species' production varied <br />within a given year, with greater produc- <br />tion at the 0- and 200 -mm topsoil depths. <br />Nonseeded species' production in 1981 was <br />significantly greater than in all other years <br />for all topsoil depths. This greater produc- <br />tion occurred because of the above average <br />precipitation in May (Table 4) and the be- <br />low normal spring temperatures. <br />Mulch type did not affect stored soil - <br />water significantly; therefore, we aver- <br />Table 2. Effect of mulch type on forage production by seeded and nonseeded species at <br />the 0 -, 200-, 400-, and 800 -mm topsoil depths at a reclaimed mine site, Shirley Basin, Wyom- <br />Ing, 1979-1982. <br />Production by Mulching Method <br />Crimped -Straw Mulch Stubble Mulch <br />Topsoil Depth Seeded Nonseeded Seeded Nonseeded <br />(mm) Species Species' Species Species <br />kg ha - ' <br />0 328at 718a 431a 573a <br />200 435a 520a 393a 627a <br />400 697a 468b 898b 228a <br />600 666a 628b 950b 379a <br />'Nonseeded species production included Hordeum )ubatum, Salsola kali, Chenopodium <br />album, Kochi scoparia, Sisymbrium altissimum, Poa spp. and Koeleria cristata. <br />'Each value represents 10 replications over 4 years, 1979 -1982; values within a topsoil <br />depth and within seeded grass species or nonseeded species with the same letter are not <br />significantly different at the 5% level as evaluated by Duncan's multiple range test. <br />Table 3. Effect of topsoil depth on forage production by seeded and nonseeded species at <br />a reclaimed mine site, Shirley Basin, Wyoming, 1979-1982. <br />Topsoil Depth <br />(mm) <br />Seeded species <br />0 <br />200 <br />400 <br />600 <br />Nonseeded speciest <br />0 <br />200 <br />400 <br />600 <br />180aX• <br />372abX <br />445bX <br />671cX <br />448aX <br />243aX <br />323aX <br />408aXY <br />Each value represents the mean of 20 observations; values within a year (within seeded or <br />nonseeded species) with the same lower case letter and values across years within a top- <br />soil depth with the same capital letter are not significantly different at the 5% level as <br />evaluated by Duncan's multiple range test. <br />tNonseeded species included Hordeum jubatum, Salsola kali, Chenopodium album, <br />Kochia scoparia, Sisymbrium altissimum, Poa spp. and Koeleria cristata. <br />Table 4. Monthly precipitation during the growing season and annual precipitation, Shirley <br />Basin, Wyoming, 1977 -1982. <br />Year March April May June July August Annual <br />1977 40 37 35 5 24 8 208 <br />1978 13 42 69 20 24 29 266 <br />1979 18 9 14 12 20 20 157 <br />1980 10 4 54 2 18 30 167 <br />1981 18 12 92 4 51 13 243 <br />1982 1 10 39 51 70 21 257 <br />aged data across mulch treatments (Table <br />5). Spring soil water levels were inversely <br />proportional to topsoil depth. This phe- <br />nomena occurred because the water -hold- <br />ing capacity of the topsoil was less than <br />that of the spoil placed below the topsoil <br />(5). Subsoil material had about one -third <br />greater water - holding capacity than the <br />topsoil at 1/3 -bar matric potential. Schu- <br />man and Taylor (5) also reported that sub- <br />soil material contained about 44% more <br />water at 15 -bar matric potential than did <br />topsoil. The data clearly show the differ- <br />ence in water - holding capacity between <br />topsoil and spoil (Table 5, below line, <br />spoil; above line, topsoil) . <br />Deep ripping resulted in some mixing of <br />1979 1980 1981 <br />274aXY <br />356aX <br />689bY <br />756bX <br />689bY <br />370aXY <br />245aX <br />189aX <br />Production by Year <br />kg ha - ' <br />Precipitation (mm) <br />410aY <br />446aX <br />968bZ <br />984bY <br />1,115bZ <br />1,133bZ <br />605aY <br />952bZ <br />1982 <br />656aZ <br />483aX <br />1,091 bZ <br />823bX <br />332abX <br />549bY <br />222aX <br />467abY <br />Table 5. Effect of topsoil depth on storage <br />and profile distribution of soil water, aver- <br />age values obtained In March of 1978 <br />through 1982. <br />Stored Water by Topsoil <br />Depth (mm) <br />Profile Depth <br />(mm) 0 200 400 600 <br />0 -150 33.5b* ( 30.0a 29.2a 27.2a <br />150 -300 40.6b 38.4b 26.7a 25.7a <br />300 -600 89.4b 85.3b 80.3b 156.9a <br />600 -900 91.8a 86.1a 89.4a 85.3a <br />Total 255.3 239.8 225.6 195.6 <br />*Each value represents the mean of 50 ob- <br />servations taken over 5 years; values fol- <br />lowed by the same letter within a profile <br />sampling depth increment are not signifi- <br />cantly different at the 5% level as evalu- <br />ated by Duncan's multiple range test. <br />March -April 1985 251 <br />