|
ably resulted from the improved soil phys-
<br />ical characteristics brought about by the
<br />. deep rooting of the barley - reflected by
<br />the infiltration data discussed later. We al-
<br />so attributed some of the increased produc-
<br />tion on the stubble plots to greater seedling
<br />establishment (6).
<br />Production of nonseeded species de-
<br />creased as topsoil depth increased on the
<br />stubble plots; however, little change oc-
<br />curred on the straw - mulched plots. Non-
<br />seeded species' production was significant-
<br />ly lower on the stubble plots than on the
<br />straw - mulched plots at the 400- and
<br />600 -mm topsoil depths -the opposite of
<br />planted species' production. The greater
<br />nonseeded species' production on the
<br />straw - mulched plots probably resulted
<br />from the poorer grass establishment. This
<br />enabled weeds and other invading native
<br />species to become established in the open
<br />areas between the grass. Nonseeded species
<br />also competed with the seeded species for
<br />water and plant nutrients. Desirable, in-
<br />vading native species only accounted for a
<br />small percentage of the nonseeded species'
<br />production; however, these invading
<br />species would be important in overall plant
<br />community diversity.
<br />Many of the trends observed in the seed-
<br />ed species' production on the stubble -
<br />mulched plots were similar to the produc-
<br />tion of the barley used in establishing the
<br />stubble mulch. Barley production was 743,
<br />878, 1,204, and 1,473 kg ha'' for the 0 -,
<br />200 -, 400 -, and 600 -mm topsoil depths, re-
<br />spectively.
<br />Table 3 shows the effect of topsoil depth
<br />on the production of seeded and nonseeded
<br />species. Seeded species' production in-
<br />creased gradually over the 4 years with no
<br />topsoil, indicating a general improvement
<br />in spoil characteristics for plant growth.
<br />This trend, which would be expected as the
<br />vegetative community develops, was gen-
<br />erally true at all topsoil depths. However,
<br />it was not always statistically significant.
<br />Seeded species' production at the 400 -
<br />and 600 -mm topsoil depths was signifi-
<br />cantly higher in all 4 years. We attributed
<br />the greater production in 1981 and 1982
<br />partially to greater precipitation than in
<br />the 2 previous years (Table 4).
<br />Nonseeded species' production varied
<br />within a given year, with greater produc-
<br />tion at the 0- and 200 -mm topsoil depths.
<br />Nonseeded species' production in 1981 was
<br />significantly greater than in all other years
<br />for all topsoil depths. This greater produc-
<br />tion occurred because of the above average
<br />precipitation in May (Table 4) and the be-
<br />low normal spring temperatures.
<br />Mulch type did not affect stored soil -
<br />water significantly; therefore, we aver-
<br />Table 2. Effect of mulch type on forage production by seeded and nonseeded species at
<br />the 0 -, 200-, 400-, and 800 -mm topsoil depths at a reclaimed mine site, Shirley Basin, Wyom-
<br />Ing, 1979-1982.
<br />Production by Mulching Method
<br />Crimped -Straw Mulch Stubble Mulch
<br />Topsoil Depth Seeded Nonseeded Seeded Nonseeded
<br />(mm) Species Species' Species Species
<br />kg ha - '
<br />0 328at 718a 431a 573a
<br />200 435a 520a 393a 627a
<br />400 697a 468b 898b 228a
<br />600 666a 628b 950b 379a
<br />'Nonseeded species production included Hordeum )ubatum, Salsola kali, Chenopodium
<br />album, Kochi scoparia, Sisymbrium altissimum, Poa spp. and Koeleria cristata.
<br />'Each value represents 10 replications over 4 years, 1979 -1982; values within a topsoil
<br />depth and within seeded grass species or nonseeded species with the same letter are not
<br />significantly different at the 5% level as evaluated by Duncan's multiple range test.
<br />Table 3. Effect of topsoil depth on forage production by seeded and nonseeded species at
<br />a reclaimed mine site, Shirley Basin, Wyoming, 1979-1982.
<br />Topsoil Depth
<br />(mm)
<br />Seeded species
<br />0
<br />200
<br />400
<br />600
<br />Nonseeded speciest
<br />0
<br />200
<br />400
<br />600
<br />180aX•
<br />372abX
<br />445bX
<br />671cX
<br />448aX
<br />243aX
<br />323aX
<br />408aXY
<br />Each value represents the mean of 20 observations; values within a year (within seeded or
<br />nonseeded species) with the same lower case letter and values across years within a top-
<br />soil depth with the same capital letter are not significantly different at the 5% level as
<br />evaluated by Duncan's multiple range test.
<br />tNonseeded species included Hordeum jubatum, Salsola kali, Chenopodium album,
<br />Kochia scoparia, Sisymbrium altissimum, Poa spp. and Koeleria cristata.
<br />Table 4. Monthly precipitation during the growing season and annual precipitation, Shirley
<br />Basin, Wyoming, 1977 -1982.
<br />Year March April May June July August Annual
<br />1977 40 37 35 5 24 8 208
<br />1978 13 42 69 20 24 29 266
<br />1979 18 9 14 12 20 20 157
<br />1980 10 4 54 2 18 30 167
<br />1981 18 12 92 4 51 13 243
<br />1982 1 10 39 51 70 21 257
<br />aged data across mulch treatments (Table
<br />5). Spring soil water levels were inversely
<br />proportional to topsoil depth. This phe-
<br />nomena occurred because the water -hold-
<br />ing capacity of the topsoil was less than
<br />that of the spoil placed below the topsoil
<br />(5). Subsoil material had about one -third
<br />greater water - holding capacity than the
<br />topsoil at 1/3 -bar matric potential. Schu-
<br />man and Taylor (5) also reported that sub-
<br />soil material contained about 44% more
<br />water at 15 -bar matric potential than did
<br />topsoil. The data clearly show the differ-
<br />ence in water - holding capacity between
<br />topsoil and spoil (Table 5, below line,
<br />spoil; above line, topsoil) .
<br />Deep ripping resulted in some mixing of
<br />1979 1980 1981
<br />274aXY
<br />356aX
<br />689bY
<br />756bX
<br />689bY
<br />370aXY
<br />245aX
<br />189aX
<br />Production by Year
<br />kg ha - '
<br />Precipitation (mm)
<br />410aY
<br />446aX
<br />968bZ
<br />984bY
<br />1,115bZ
<br />1,133bZ
<br />605aY
<br />952bZ
<br />1982
<br />656aZ
<br />483aX
<br />1,091 bZ
<br />823bX
<br />332abX
<br />549bY
<br />222aX
<br />467abY
<br />Table 5. Effect of topsoil depth on storage
<br />and profile distribution of soil water, aver-
<br />age values obtained In March of 1978
<br />through 1982.
<br />Stored Water by Topsoil
<br />Depth (mm)
<br />Profile Depth
<br />(mm) 0 200 400 600
<br />0 -150 33.5b* ( 30.0a 29.2a 27.2a
<br />150 -300 40.6b 38.4b 26.7a 25.7a
<br />300 -600 89.4b 85.3b 80.3b 156.9a
<br />600 -900 91.8a 86.1a 89.4a 85.3a
<br />Total 255.3 239.8 225.6 195.6
<br />*Each value represents the mean of 50 ob-
<br />servations taken over 5 years; values fol-
<br />lowed by the same letter within a profile
<br />sampling depth increment are not signifi-
<br />cantly different at the 5% level as evalu-
<br />ated by Duncan's multiple range test.
<br />March -April 1985 251
<br />
|