My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/28/2012 3:05:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/8/2002
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT, PART 1
From
HABITAT MGMT
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Topography <br />Small areas having "steep" slopes greater than 20% would help create some types of habitat diversity, <br />Due to microciimatic effects, distinctive plant communities occur on steep south and north slope <br />aspects in many native landscapes. In tension zones where physiognomic types co mpete,.forests are <br />more prevalent on north aspects and in coulees, whereas warm - season grasses and some shrub species <br />prefer warm aspects. The effects of aspect are particularly important during the establishment phase. <br />Some mines already take advantage of habitat differences associated with topography, but with slopes <br />gentler than 20%, microciintates are limited when compared to premine Landscapes. <br />Steeper slopes, evert short ones, increase the likelihood of water erosion. A limited amount of surficial <br />erosion should be acceptable on reclamation provided transport does not extend beyond reclamation <br />boundaries. Sediment traps at the base of slopes and possibly some surface hardening with rock or <br />gravel caps at critical points would limit transport. • <br />Erosion was and is a primary force in creating diverse landscapes, but it is considered the enemy in <br />reclamation. There is a fundamental contradiction in battling the forces responsible for diversity at <br />every turn and at the same time comparing postntine and premine landscape diversity. <br />Direct-Haul Topsoil and Seeding <br />Revegetation seeks to greatly accelerate the healing process by establishing stable site - protecting„ site- <br />enhancing plant communities sooner than would naturally develop, e.g., in a go -back scenario. Drill- <br />seeding competitive cultivars of broad environmental tolerance accomplishes this goal, but at the cost <br />of less competitive species of narrow ecological amplitude. <br />The reclamation `all-star' species fall into Grime's (1979) category of stress - tolerant competitors. Not <br />only are they well adapted to climatic and other stresses, they are strong competitors. By virtue of <br />their ability to capture resources, strong competitors subject weaker competitors to "plant induced" or <br />plant intensified stress. Grimes concluded (p. 129): "Dominance by stress - tolerant competitors is <br />particularly common in unfertilized grasslands in semi -arid continental climates." In contrast, <br />specialist species can find suitable habitats shrinking or evert disappearing in a variable environment. <br />This could easily lead to local extirpation, but Bazzaz and Sultan (1987) thought the net effect of <br />environmental fluctuations resulted in differential reproductive success among genotypes in particular <br />seasons rather than differential mortality. <br />Seeding the most successful revegetation species may negate many potential advantages of direct - haul <br />topsoiling, depending upon the set of propagules associated with the transported soil. Abul -Fatih and <br />Bazzaz (1979) found that removing a competitive species of broad habitat breadth (Ambrosia triida) <br />resulted in increased community diversity. <br />Whitman and others (1943) found that abandoned cultivated fields in western North Dakota developed <br />a good mid -grass cover within eight to 10 years ater they were abandoned, although restoration of the <br />short grass component and other late seral components could take 40 to 60 years or more. Abandoned <br />cropland manifestly differs from reclaimed fields, but direct -haul topsoil surely has more viable native <br />perennial propagules than the topsoil of cropland at the time of abandonment. <br />Whitman's mid -grass stage, identified as the third sere, was in its early years dominated by western <br />wheatgrass, a species propagated mainly by rhizomes. Hs paper gives scant attention to nongrasses <br />( "perennial weeds "), but one has the impression that after 10 years, these abandoned fields would meet <br />coal mine revegetation criteria except for the seasonality requirement. <br />Unseeded direct -haul soils might well foster plant communities of higher diversity than seeded fields, <br />particularly if applied to "stressed" habitats. Few would advocate unseeded spoils as a reclamation <br />151 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.