My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-31_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-31_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:42 PM
Creation date
3/27/2012 4:01:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/31/2002
Doc Name
APPROVAL OF A 112 PERMIT APPLICATION OVER OBJECTIONS
From
GCC RIO GRANDE
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Blasting Impacts Assessment for the Proposed GCC Rio Grande, Inc. Quarry in Pueblo County, Colorado <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />GCC Rio Grande, Inc. (GCC) currently owns or leases land located in Pueblo County, Colorado. <br />This property, south of the City of Pueblo, Colorado, is bounded to the north by the St Charles <br />River and roughly to the west by Denver Rio Grande Rail Road (DRGRR) tracks. With the intent <br />to develop a cement plant and limestone feed quarry at this site, GCC has applied to the Colorado <br />Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals and Geology (CO- DNR -DMG) for a <br />mining permit. In the geotechnical stability section (6.5) of the permit request, the applicant is <br />required to demonstrate, through appropriate blasting, vibration, geotechnical and structural <br />engineering analyses, that off -site areas will not be adversely affected by blasting. GCC has <br />retained Gordon F. Revey, Principal consultant of REVEY Associates, Inc. (RAI), to perform the <br />required blasting impacts analyses. RAI is a company that specifically focuses on rock blasting <br />design, controls and environmental impacts work. <br />On July 5, 2002, Gordon F. Revey (author) inspected the proposed quarry site. James D. Gill, P.E., <br />representing Contour Consulting Engineering, LLC, accompanied the author during this visit. The <br />locations of residential properties, waterways, wells, roadways, bridges, utilities and other <br />facilities in the area, along with the topography of the site, were studied during this site visit. The <br />author has also reviewed the mining permit application for the Red Rock Plant and Mine, No. M- <br />2002 -004. <br />The primary focus of this report is to develop a listing of all potential blasting issues and damage <br />concerns and to evaluate their impacts or validity. The report was created to address concerns <br />raised by written comments submitted to the Division of Minerals and Geology during the public <br />comment period on the Red Rock Plant and Mine, issues designated in the Pre - Hearing Order of <br />June 7, 2002, and to provide additional information to the Mined Land Reclamation Board and the <br />Division of Minerals and Geology on the lack of blasting impacts at the Red Rock Plant and Mine. <br />In order to acquaint the reader with the physical science of seemingly complex effects, e.g. ground <br />vibration and air - overpressure (blast noise), a brief technical review of blasting effects and <br />technical terms is included in the body of this report. The technical sections also include reviews <br />of applicable regulatory limits, which are followed by a specific evaluation of typical blasting <br />issues and potential physical impacts of blasting at the proposed Red Rock Project. A map <br />showing the location of the site is shown in Figure 1.1. <br />All identified issues and findings expressed in this report are based on the author's observations <br />made at the site, prior experience, industry- standard technical calculations, and maps, reports and <br />information provided by other engineers and professionals representing GCC and public <br />comments. <br />REVEY Associates, Inc. Page 1 July 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.