My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-06_HYDROLOGY - C1980007 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2012-02-06_HYDROLOGY - C1980007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:48:23 PM
Creation date
3/23/2012 3:43:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/6/2012
Doc Name
Clarification for 3rd Quarter 2011 Sediment Pond Inspection Report
From
Kathy Welt
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Sediment Pond Inspections
Media Type
d
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
runoff— the time of year when the ponds are filled and drained more often). As a result we hardly ever (if <br />ever) allowed the ponds to even get close to a sediment level (elevation) requiring cleanout. <br />Please let me know if you have further questions or require clarification. <br />Cathy `Weft, <br />Environmental Engineer III <br />Mountain Coal Company, LLC <br />West Elk Mine <br />P.O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />Phone (970) 929 -2238 <br />Cell (970) 433 -1022 <br />Fax (970) 929 -5050 <br />From: Stark, Jim [mailto:Jim.Stark@state.co.us] <br />Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:33 PM <br />To: Welt, Kathy <br />Cc: Schiro, Robin; Hernandez, Alysha <br />Subject: 3Q11 Sediment Pond Inspection Reports <br />The Division has reviewed the 3011 Sediment Pond Inspection Report for the West Elk Mine. Thank you for your timely <br />submittal of this report. The report contained water and sediment levels for the following ponds: MB -1 (now FW -2), MB -3, <br />MB -4, MB -5E, FW -1, SG -1, RPE, NSSA and the deepwell pond. All of these ponds had low sediment levels (all less than <br />the 7% sediment level reported for pond SG -1) and all of the ponds, with the exception of NSSA and FW -2, contained <br />water. None of the ponds were reported as discharging during the inspection. There were no problems identified with <br />any of the ponds (rills and gullies, inadequate vegetation, burrows, settling, etc.). This information correlates well with the <br />Division's observations during its monthly site inspections. <br />I do have two questions regarding the sediment pond inspection report. First, how is the sediment level in the ponds <br />determined? Second, there are more ponds on site, including the waste water treatment pond, MWTF and the mine water <br />to Minnesota Creek pond, that are included in the NPDES permit but not in included in the quarterly pond inspection <br />report. Why are these ponds not included in this report? Thanks. <br />James R Stark <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />(303) 866 -3567 X8145 <br />www.mining.state.co.us <br />** *Email Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail, and in any accompanying documents, may constitute <br />confidential and /or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the designated recipient. If <br />you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are hereby <br />notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance on this e-mail is <br />strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and <br />delete the message from your system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.