My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-13_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2012-01-13_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:25 PM
Creation date
3/23/2012 12:31:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/13/2012
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review No. 3 (Emailed)
From
Marcia Talvitie
To
Murari Shrestha
Media Type
d
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C -2010 -089 <br />New Horizon North Mine <br />2.04.10 Vegetation Information <br />PARNos. 1- IA -IB, 2- 2A -2B, 3 <br />Page 24 of 60 <br />1. The diversity standard Proposed in PAP Sec. 2.04. 10 p. 4 is unclear. Please elaborate on the <br />proposed diversity standard stated as "The reclaimed plant community shall be composed of <br />at least the dominant species comprising at least 5 % of the relative plant cover." <br />The NI-12 and NHN mines have two different permits and the species diversity standards <br />need to be listed separately in each_pernlit. It is understandable that the standards will be <br />the same for both permits, however, for consistency, accuracy and autonomy between <br />permits, please include the appropriate language for the species diversity standard in the <br />NHN permit instead of referring to the NI-12 permit: <br />t <br />?,.# 0 `� e ,-C "0", C, OF t z >tY iii rr tt s`' <br />Y`h { <br />a. .?.' 00 ii ;i <`lr.:. <br />2. In Section 2.04. 10 (pages 1, 7, and 9 -18), the operator states that there are seven (7) major <br />vegetation communities comprising >5% of the proposed mine area or >10 acres, but then <br />only describes six (6) major vegetation communities. Please bring this section into <br />agreement. Are there seven major communities, or are there six? If there are seven, please <br />include a description of the seventh. Itent resoh,, e in A y-. 11 res n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.