My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-14_HYDROLOGY - M1992069
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1992069
>
2012-03-14_HYDROLOGY - M1992069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:55:09 PM
Creation date
3/19/2012 4:00:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992069
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
3/14/2012
Doc Name
COMBINED WATER REPLACEMENT PLAN
From
DWR
To
APPLEGATE GROUP
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jared Dains <br />South Platte Combined Replacement Plan <br />March 14, 2012 <br />Page 16 <br />1. Adapted from EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND AGRONOMIC RESPONSES IN FORMERLY <br />IRRIGATED MOUNTAIN MEADOWS, South Park, Colorado, March 1, 1990; Revised <br />September 1, 1991 <br />14. Approval of this plan is for the purposes as stated herein. This office must first <br />approve any additional uses for which the water may be used. The approval of this <br />substitute water supply plan does not relieve the Applicant and /or landowner of the <br />requirement to obtain a Water Court decree approving a permanent plan for <br />augmentation or mitigation to ensure the permanent replacement of all depletions, <br />including long -term evaporation losses and lagged depletions after gravel mining <br />operations have ceased. If reclamation of the mine sites will produce a permanent <br />water surface exposing groundwater to evaporation, an application for a plan for <br />augmentation must be filed with the Division 1 Water Court at least three (3) years <br />prior to the completion of mining to include, but not be limited to, long -term <br />evaporation losses and lagged depletions. If a lined pond results after reclamation, <br />replacement of lagged depletions shall continue until there is no longer an effect on <br />stream flow. According to the plan, mining has ceased at the Teti Pit, North Dahlia <br />Pit, Jeronimus Pit, Platte Valley Pit, F- Street Pit, Brighton Pit, Tucson Pit, Distel Pit. <br />Since mining has ceased at these sites, either the lakes must be lined or backfilled, or <br />an application for a plan of augmentation for the site must be filed with the water court. <br />In addition all lagged depletions shall continue to be replaced under a SWSP until <br />there is no longer an effect on stream flow or a court approved augmentation plan is <br />approved by the water court. <br />15. The name, address, and phone number of a contact person who will be responsible for the <br />operation and accounting of this plan must be provided to the Water Commissioner(s) and <br />the Division Engineer. <br />16. This plan may be revoked or modified at any time should it be determined that injury to other <br />vested water rights has or will occur as a result of the operation of this plan. Should this <br />substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or be revoked prior to adjudication of a <br />permanent plan for augmentation, all use of ground water must cease immediately. <br />17. In accordance with amendments to §25 -8- 202(7), C.R.S., and "Senate Bill 89 -181 Rules <br />and Regulations" adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine whether <br />the substitute supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to senior appropriators. As <br />such, water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to determine if the water <br />quality is appropriate for downstream water users. <br />18. The decision of the State Engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall not <br />create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any water court <br />case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the substitute water supply <br />plan. This decision shall not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar manner in any other <br />applications involving other plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not <br />imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law contained herein, or with <br />the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.