My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (80)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (80)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 2:24:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 6, Part 4: Storm Water Management Plan
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. SEDIMENT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND PERFORMANCE <br />Performance -based pond sizing criteria was developed for the MLE1 storm water <br />assessment that would ensure that consistent and reasonable removal of sediment will <br />occur in the detention ponds. Two functional types of ponds are generally constructed at <br />the mine. Simple detention ponds (Best Management Practice or BMP Ponds) are built <br />based on runoff within sub - watersheds where functionality is important but that <br />conservative design criteria is not regulated or justified. Such ponds are typically <br />designed for lower magnitude, more frequent storms and are sized for the discharge <br />volume from a single storm. Terminal Enhanced Management Practice detention ponds <br />( "EMP Ponds ") are constructed for twice the volume of the 10- year /24 -hour storm. <br />Implicit within those criteria are several factors to ensure that sediment and water <br />release will be automatically controlled without administrative intervention. <br />For example, the second storm "volume" provides assurance that inevitable <br />accumulations of sediment from previous storm events will not hinder the ability to store <br />the first 10 -year storm. The beginning condition for these MLE2 SEDCAD computations <br />includes the assumption that two feet of sediment accumulation would be present before <br />the storm. In addition, the provision of two storm volumes will ensure that effective <br />sediment removal can occur, even if a second storm occurs on the tail of the first. <br />Sediment samples from undisturbed areas of Grassy Valley were analyzed by <br />conducting hydrometer settling tests as part of the MLE1 storm water assessment to <br />determine the expected performance of detention ponds for settling and removing <br />sediment from storm water. (The characteristics of those samples were consistent with <br />the descriptions of the soils report.) It was concluded, and adopted as a procedure for <br />MLE1, that by conforming to certain geometric relationships (shapes) in the detention <br />pond design and by adopting the double 10- yr /24 -hr volume criteria a predictable <br />performance for sediment removal can be anticipated. The two geometric properties are <br />simply their construction with 2:1 interior slopes and a 15 -foot depth. From those two <br />properties and by knowing the required storage volume the surface area and base area <br />can be calculated and the following performance can be expected: <br />o If two 10- yr /24 -hr storms occur in quick succession (a matter of a day or two) the <br />EMP Ponds should remove essentially all but colloidal clays (98% total removal) <br />within a day after cessation of runoff. <br />Client: CC &V Gold Mining Co. 2/2/12 <br />Title: Storm Water Management, MLE2 Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.