My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (80)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (80)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 2:24:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 6, Part 4: Storm Water Management Plan
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
methodology (known as the SCS Method) and runoff "Curve Numbers" that are used for <br />determining infiltration were adopted and accepted by participants in both the <br />Amendment 8 and MLE1 Amendment 9 review process, and are also used by AMEC for <br />design of storm water in the Squaw Gulch VLF area. Each hydrologic basin (illustrated <br />and summarized on Drawing Sheets 1 and 2) includes sub - watershed areas with <br />different types of surface conditions such as vegetation types or soil characteristics. <br />Each surface condition can also be categorized as distinct land -uses, and is associated <br />with a specific SCS Curve Number. The previously adopted Curve Number criteria are <br />listed below: <br />• Existing wooded areas, Curve Number 66 <br />• Grassed existing areas and closure areas reclaimed with growth media and <br />Revegetation methods, Curve Number 71. <br />• Rock Fill Slopes on the faces of stockpiles before reclamation, Curve Number 50 <br />• Roads and compacted stockpiles with limited permeability, Curve Number 90. <br />The NRCS soil survey illustrates that there are essentially only three significant soil <br />types in the areas around the perimeter of the mine that have not been previously <br />disturbed. One common soil type is RgR —Rogert-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 60 <br />percent slopes —but the rock outcrops are not a significant factor in storm water <br />management. The other two prevalent soil types are EB- Quander- Bushpark —very <br />gravelly loams, 5 to 40 percent slopes and Sz —Seitz very gravelly loam, 20 to 50 <br />percent slopes. Those soils have a similar stratigraphy but vary in their hydrologic <br />properties. Both include a 12" to 14" surface horizon of gravelly loam overlaying an <br />additional four feet of either cobbly or gravelly clay loam. The surface layer is relatively <br />permeable for both while the underlying clay loams tend to be moderate to high <br />permeability for the Quander - Bushpark soils and moderate to low permeability for the <br />Seitz soils. Detention ponds will generally be constructed in higher permeability <br />Quander - Bushpark soils in Grassy Valley, but in lower permeability Seitz soils on the <br />Poverty Gulch, North Cresson side of the mine. The subsurface soils will affect the <br />percolation of accumulated water from detention ponds into the diatreme and generally <br />the exfiltration rate from the ponds. <br />Client: CC &V Gold Mining Co. 2/2/12 <br />Title: Storm Water Management, MLE2 Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.