My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (80)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (80)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 2:24:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 6, Part 4: Storm Water Management Plan
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR UPPER GRASSY VALLEY <br />The proposed arrangement of storm water management facilities for all expected <br />conditions is illustrated on Drawing Sheets 3 and 4. Sheet 3 shows the proposed <br />configurations of the Upper Grassy Valley basin in its current condition (Detail 1), after mining <br />(Detail 2), and after reclamation (Detail 3). Details of a fourth configuration are provided <br />(Detail 7) in which realignment of Upper Grassy Valley is proposed after the WHEX pit has <br />been backfilled. Sheet 4 includes details of the EMP Ponds, a schematic of the storm water <br />flow, profiles of the water ways, and design dimensions for the channels and ponds. <br />The conditions shown on Detail 1 (Existing Conditions) have been demonstrated by <br />SEDCAD computations, and by previous experience at the mine to have the highest potential <br />for generating sediment and runoff. The land -use conditions during mining (Detail 2) include <br />high proportions of rock -fill faces (Curve Number 50) where runoff is low, even while the top <br />of the stockpile may be highly compacted with mine trucks (Curve Number 90). The low - <br />runoff effect of stockpile areas has been historically proven during construction of the Squaw <br />Gulch Overburden Stockpile. Runoff at the toe of the embankment is generally nonexistent <br />in recent years after full development of the embankment. Five detention ponds were <br />constructed and often stored runoff during early years of the Squaw Gulch Stockpile <br />construction. The existing conditions are also most likely to create erosion during tree and <br />topsoil removal when soils are exposed and disturbed. <br />Runoff during and after he reclamation phase (Details 3 and 7) should also be less <br />than current conditions of land -use because reclamation will inherently include Best <br />Management Practices, all of which will result in lower excess precipitation (lower Curve <br />Numbers). Accordingly existing conditions are considered to be the best criteria for designing <br />the ponds and channels and have therefore been used to calculate the required pond <br />volumes. <br />Client: CC&V Gold Mining Co. 2/2/12 <br />Title: Storm Water Management, MLE2 Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.