My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (71)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (71)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 1:31:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Appendix D: Assessment of Underground Workings within Limits of Valley Leasch Facility
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Type of Feature <br />Total Number <br />Mapped <br />Number Mapped <br />Within Proposed <br />VLF Footprint <br />Number Indicated <br />in Historical <br />Mining Records <br />Test Pit or Conical Surface Working <br />> 430 <br />> 430 <br />-- <br />Trench <br />26 <br />25 <br />-- <br />Depression <br />17 <br />17 <br />-- <br />Collapsed Shaft <br />48 <br />45 <br />-- <br />Shallow Shaft or Surface Working <br />20 <br />16 <br />-- <br />Deep or Timbered Shaft <br />68 <br />59 <br />58 <br />Slot Mine or Open/Collapsed Stope <br />20 <br />18 <br />-- <br />Open or Collapsed Adit <br />40 <br />36 <br />17 <br />February 7, 2007 <br />-5- 063 -2140 <br />While the field program focused on features within the limits of the proposed Squaw Gulch VLF, <br />some shafts and other important features are present just outside the VLF limits These workings <br />may, depending on their size, adversely affect the VLF or a future perimeter access road. Therefore, <br />these features were included in the mapping effort. <br />Table 2, below, provides a summary of the number of features of each type mapped. Also included is <br />a comparison between the number of features mapped and the number predicted by the historical <br />mining records. Note that there are many more mapped features than indicated in the historical <br />records. In the case of shafts, some of this is likely caused by conservatively classifying some <br />features as collapsed shafts when, in fact, they may be large test pits or surface workings. Also, there <br />are probably some smaller shafts that were never recorded in the historical records. In the case of <br />adits, some were probably counted more than once in the field. This was done because most of the <br />adits were at least partially collapsed. When an adit collapses, it can appear that there is a second <br />opening at the location of the collapse. If a single adit is collapsed in several locations, it can appear <br />that there are several smaller adits as opposed to one larger one. This reasoning is supported by the <br />fact that many of the mapped adits are clustered together along the alignment of adits recorded in the <br />historical records. These classification uncertainties will be resolved by the results of the proposed <br />Phase II field investigation activities. <br />TABLE 2 <br />NUMBER OF MAPPED HISTORICAL MINE WORKINGS <br />1:,., Twoos-0,Mw_H157o131CwLwo,KU.S.INw,.130,.00C Golder Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.