My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (71)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (71)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 1:31:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Appendix D: Assessment of Underground Workings within Limits of Valley Leasch Facility
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 7, 2007 <br />- -7- 063 -2140 <br />indeterminately sized features will be drilled to define those requiring further investigation during the <br />confirmatory drilling program. <br />Various approaches and criteria were used to select the locations of the drill holes, including the <br />following: <br />• General trends in the underground workings can be noted from surface <br />disturbance observations developed during the field reconnaissance program and <br />from the historical mining records. This information provides an indication of <br />possible connections between shafts. Holes should be drilled across these <br />lineaments between shafts to determine if the underground workings between <br />shafts have been mined close to the surface. <br />• Underground workings of moderate to shallow depth may have been mined close <br />to the surface. Holes should be drilled across the alignment of such workings. <br />• Some areas that have been mined or have caved through to the surface have local <br />indications that shallow stopes extended away from the area. Holes should be <br />drilled to provide an indication of how far such stopes might extend away from <br />the open surface features. <br />• Areas indicated in the mining records as having been excavated with wide open <br />stopes, and areas observed in the field where multiple openings appeared to be <br />very close together may have caved up to close to the surface. Holes should be <br />drilled into these areas to determine if open voids are present close to the surface. <br />• Lateral extensions that were observed in the field to extend from open shafts are <br />inherently shallow, and may represent potentially unstable excavations. Holes <br />should be drilled across such features to determine the approximate geometry and <br />thickness of the crown pillar. <br />• Some of the features identified in the surface reconnaissance program as <br />collapsed shafts may not, in fact, be collapsed shafts. Similarly, some of the <br />depressions noted in the field logs may be indications of collapsing drifts or <br />stopes. Where the designation of these features isn't certain, they should be <br />drilled or excavated in order verify the type and extent of these workings. <br />• In some cases, no features were identified during the surface reconnaissance at <br />locations where historical mining records show major shafts or adit openings. <br />These locations were targeted to verify or refute the historical records and <br />confirm the presence or absence of mining disturbance. <br />As in previous CC &V drilling programs, the target depth for remediation of underground workings is <br />anticipated to be approximately 50 feet below the finished soil liner fill subgrade. In general, the <br />objective of the preliminary and confirmatory drilling programs is to identify workings for <br />L`96 \21,PDaW1P11DUSl WORK.¢ NOS- FNI. O+ FF90TP10 DISfORICALVIOR[NOSFNIAIFEHOi DOC Golder Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.