My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (69)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (69)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 4:36:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Appendix B: Part 2
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil /Geosynthetic Interface Test Report <br />Project Valley Leach Facility - Cripple Creek & Victor Project No. DV108 -130.7 <br />Lab No. Date Tested 7/24 - 7/27/07 Tested By spb <br />Test Description SWTP -99 vs 80 mil Text HDPE vs. Overliner (Composite) Checked By spb <br />Sample I.D: <br />Normal Stress Range, psf 7200 14400 21600 28800 Total No. of Points Requested 4 <br />Geomembrane Data SWTP -99 vs 80 mil Text HDPE vs. Overliner (Composite) Test No. (file) 27026A -D <br />Manufacturer <br />Lot No. <br />Roll No. Textured? Yes Peak to Peak Thickness, mil 80 <br />Specified Thickness, mil 80 <br />Test Target Parameters Moisture Content, % 17.5 Dry Density, pcf 105.8 <br />Observations: The clay (subgrade) was compacted in the lower shear box half with dimensions of 10 in. x 12.0 in. x 2.5 inches deep. <br />The subgrade surface was sprayed with water prior to placing the geomembrane coupon on it. The coupon was left floating and not <br />anchored to either the top or bottom box halves. The overliner was placed loosely and lightly tamped prior to saturating with tap water. <br />With the loading plate assembled and the normal force applied the sample was allowed to consolidate approximately 8 hours prior to <br />initiating shear displacement. No punctures or tears were observed in the coupons upon completion of the test. The failure plane existed <br />the interface between the smooth side and the overliner at the 50 psi stress and between the subgrade and the textured surface for all others. <br />Upper Box Half Description Overliner Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand <br />Lower Box Half Description SWTP -99, compacted to approx. 95% MDD at OMC +2% <br />Normal Stress <br />Top Box Fixed Position <br />- (stationary) <br />80mil Textured HDPE Gap <br />Overliner <br />(textured surface against subgrade) <br />Outer container (allows for saturation) —� <br />/� <br />Shear r Direction <br />SWTP -99 (subgrade) <br />Default Test Descriptions (unless noted otherwise) <br />1 The test was performed in a Boart Longyear 300mm shear device, using an 8inch x 8 inch square insert. <br />2 The rate of displacement was 0.02 in. /min. (0.50 mm/min.) for each stress. <br />3 The geomembrane coupon was not anchored. The coupon was sandwiched between the overliner and rested on the compacted subgrade. <br />4 Load increments were recorded in 10 lbf increments. <br />5 The Geosynthetic coupons are available for inspection at the lab. <br />6 The samples were allowed to consolidate for approximately 8 hours prior to initializing shear <br />movement. The overliner was saturated with tap water and allow to fully drain prior to initializing shear displacement. <br />7 The geomembrane was tested in machine direction. No testing was performed in the cross - machine direction. <br />Knight Piesold and Co. <br />Geotechnical Laboratory <br />8/7/2007 <br />Knight Resold <br />Direct Shear Test <br />ASTM D 5321 <br />108 -130 -7 Cripple Creek rev 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.