My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (69)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (69)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 4:36:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Appendix B: Part 2
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.3 Geosvnthetic and Soil Materials <br />The geosynthetic and soil materials used in the testing program are presented in <br />Appendix A. The geomembrane materials were provided to GeoSyntec by CC&V. The <br />three site soils were obtained from the project site by CC &V and delivered directly to <br />GeoSyntec for testing. <br />2.4 Test Confi uration and Procedures for Interface Direct Shear Tests <br />The configuration of the test specimens and the specific test procedures used to <br />conduct each of the interface direct shear tests are presented in Appendix B. GeoSyntec <br />understands that the test procedures and test conditions were selected by Mr. Mandziak <br />of CC &V to model anticipated field conditions. <br />3. TEST RESULTS <br />3.1 Failure Modes <br />For Test Series 1, shear failure (sliding) occurred between the drain cover fill and <br />the geomembrane. For Test Series 2 and 3, sliding occurred between the clay borrow <br />soil liner (SLC -4) and the textured side of the geomembrane. <br />3.2 Data Presentation <br />C 2000 GcoSvntec Consultants <br />For each of the interface direct shear tests, the total- stress shearing resistance was <br />evaluated for each applied normal stress. The test data were plotted on a graph of shear <br />force versus horizontal displacement. The resulting plots are presented in Appendix C. <br />The peak value of shear force was used to calculate the peak shear strength. The large <br />displacement shear strength (TL) was calculated by using the shear force measured at the <br />end of each test. No area correction was used when computing normal and shear <br />stresses because each test was performed using a constant effective sample area (i.e., the <br />area of the lower shear box was larger than that of the upper shear box). <br />The calculated shear strengths are plotted on a graph of shear stress versus normal <br />stress. The results were used to evaluate total- stress peak and large displacement shear <br />strength envelopes. A straight line was drawn from the origin through the data points <br />GLI1126 /SGI00011.DOC 2 00.02.25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.