My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (65)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (65)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 3:51:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Facility Design, Part 1: Table of Contents & Summary
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company Squaw Gulch Valley Leach Facility Design <br />The detailed peak flow calculations for the VLF surface water models are included in <br />Appendix F.2. Results from the hydraulic analyses indicate that the operational peak <br />flow for the VLF will be approximately 215 cubic feet per second (cfs) at the <br />headwaters of Squaw Gulch, which occurs during Phase 1 construction activities. The <br />peak flow will reduce over time as the VLF is extended further into Squaw Gulch and <br />the watershed area is reduced. <br />6.2 Runoff Curve Numbers <br />The composite curve numbers used in the hydrological modeling were calculated from <br />curve numbers for three general land uses inside the sub - watershed areas that <br />contribute to the Squaw Gulch VLF surface -water diversions. These uses are <br />classified as "original ground," "roads and stockpiles," and "fill slopes." As noted <br />above, the values of their Soil Conservation Service (SCS) [now Natural Resource <br />Conservation Service (NRCS)] curve numbers are identical to those submitted by <br />CC &V to the OMLR, as documented in a March 4, 1997, letter from CC &V (1997a) <br />titled, "Cresson Project: Permit M- 1980 -244: Surface Water Drainage Modifications <br />Arequa Gulch Overburden Storage Area," for the Cresson Project. A copy of this letter <br />is presented in Appendix F.1. <br />The three land use categories are described as follows: <br />• Original Ground: SCS Soil Type B (sandy soils and loess) was assumed in these <br />areas and consists primarily of 4 to 12 inches of coarse topsoil covered with grass, <br />brush, or trees and underlain by a loose, rocky sandy soil. The vegetation was <br />viewed as either a thin vegetative stand with limited cover in meadow areas or with <br />good vegetative cover in forested areas. This category also included revegetated <br />ground. <br />o Wooded Curve Number = 66 <br />o Grass Curve Number = 71 <br />• Roads and Stockpile Surfaces: SCS Soil Type D (shallow soils with nearly <br />impermeable sub - horizons) was assumed in these areas due to the expected <br />compaction from heavy mining equipment. The area consists of haul roads and <br />horizontal surfaces of the OSA. These areas are compacted by haul trucks. <br />o Curve Number = 90 <br />• Fill Slopes: SCS Soil Type A was used in these areas due to the coarse nature of <br />rockfill material before revegetation. The area consists of segregated coarse rock <br />overburden faces with a high infiltration rate. Runoff is seldom observed from <br />these areas. <br />o Curve Number = 50 <br />Project No.: 74201125G0 Page 33 <br />1 September 2011 <br />amec0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.