My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (65)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (65)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 3:51:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Facility Design, Part 1: Table of Contents & Summary
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company Squaw Gulch Valley Leach Facility Design <br />published shear strength data for rock fill materials (Leps, 1970), where the internal <br />friction angles range between 39 to 50 degrees for similar -sized materials under <br />similar normal stresses. Based on the results of the shear tests conducted on the <br />Cresson ore and published data, an internal friction angle of 40 degrees is suitable for <br />the stability analyses. The in -place bulk density of the material is modeled at 110 pcf, <br />which is consistent with that submitted previously to the OMLR. <br />Composite Liner. Interface shear strength testing performed as part of the design for <br />the OSA consisted of SLF overlain by 80 -mil textured LLDPE liner (textured side <br />down) overlain by DCF. Interface shear strength testing was performed for normal <br />loads of 50, 100, 150, and 200 psi. The interface testing for these normal loads was <br />used to define a linear relationship (friction angle and cohesion) between the normal <br />loads calculated in the stability section slices and the corresponding shear strength. <br />The SLF was compacted to 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density <br />at 2 percent above the optimum moisture content. At large strain (45 mm), the <br />residual interface shear strength had a friction angle of 23.5 degrees. At low stress, <br />the failure surface developed between the geomembrane and the DCF. At higher <br />stresses, the failure surface developed between the geomembrane and the SLF. No <br />further interface testing was conducted for the PSSA composite liner systems because <br />these materials were already tested as part of the Cresson Project VLF design. <br />Interface shear strength test results for the Cresson Project are presented in Appendix <br />B.6. <br />Foundation Material. For the stability analyses, the foundation material shear <br />strength was modeled with an angle of internal friction of 40 degrees and no cohesion, <br />which represents either a bedrock foundation or a granular fill foundation. The results <br />of the geotechnical investigation indicate the foundation of the VLF will primarily be <br />constructed in bedrock. This is consistent with what was used in Amendment No. 9 to <br />represent the shear strength of the foundation. <br />PSSA Embankment Fill. The PSSA embankment will be constructed using structural <br />fill and other suitable coarse fill. For the stability analyses, the PSSA embankment fill <br />shear strength was modeled with an angle of internal friction of 38 degrees and no <br />cohesion. <br />Piezometric Data. The piezometric head was modeled as 1 foot above and parallel to <br />the lined surface, which is consistent with the conditions used in Amendment Nos. 6, <br />7, 8, and 9 (CC&V 1993a, 1998, 2000, 2008). <br />5.1.3 Stability Results <br />The maximum side slope of 1.6H:1 V was calculated as part of an infinite slope <br />analysis, which represents the steepest side slope that will still provide a pseudo- static <br />FOS of 1.0 or greater for surface raveling of ore material during a 0.14g seismic event. <br />Infinite slope stability analyses are presented in Appendix E.1. Based on this analysis, <br />Project No.: 74201125G0 Page 29 <br />1 September 2011 <br />amec0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.