My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (65)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (65)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 3:51:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 5, Facility Design, Part 1: Table of Contents & Summary
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company Squaw Gulch Valley Leach Facility Design <br />of 2 to 4 feet of growth medium in the valley floor bounded by Highway 67, and 6 to 18 <br />inches of growth medium up the valley slopes. The growth medium was underlain by <br />clayey gravels, clayey sands, silty gravels, silty sands, and clay. These soils classify <br />as GC, SC, GM, SM and CL under the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). <br />Underlying these soils was fractured bedrock to depths ranging from approximately 4 <br />feet upslope of the valley to 19 feet in the valley floor, with an average depth <br />encountered of approximately 11 feet. The encountered bedrock was predominantly <br />fragmented breccia with large clasts, and secondarily a competent and unweathered <br />granodiorite. <br />During the 2007 field investigation performed by SWC, perched groundwater was <br />encountered in 12 test pits located within the Squaw Gulch valley floor bounded by <br />Highway 67. The groundwater was intercepted at an average depth of 5 feet and was <br />flowing at a rate of approximately 3 to 6 gallons per minute (gpm) from the test pit <br />sidewalls. The perched groundwater was primarily contained within alluvium present <br />in the valley floor and is likely to be seasonal. Groundwater was not encountered in <br />any of the test pits excavated in Squaw Gulch during the 2010 AMEC field <br />investigation. <br />Three core holes, SWCBH -1 through SWCBH -3, were drilled within the footprint of the <br />proposed PSSA embankment. The location of the geotechnical borings are shown on <br />Drawing A20. The borings were advanced until bedrock was encountered, at which <br />point coring commenced. Standard penetration tests (SPT) were conducted in all <br />borings to assess the in place stiffness of foundation materials. The SPT blow counts <br />ranged from 7 to 50 (refusal), with an average of approximately 22, indicating the <br />presence of medium to dense in -place soils. <br />The soils encountered in the borings consisted of well - graded sands with clay and silt, <br />clayey sands, and silty sands. These soils classify as SW -SC, SW -SM, SC, and SM <br />under the USCS. SWCBH -1, SWCBH -2, and SWCBH -3 intercepted bedrock at <br />depths of 20, 24, and 9 feet, respectively. <br />The coring commenced when the borings encountered refusal at the bedrock <br />interface. The coring was advanced at least 10 feet into competent bedrock to assess <br />the in -place permeability of the rock and to characterize the general rock mass <br />conditions. The bedrock encountered in all core holes consisted of unweathered, <br />competent granodiorite with slight iron staining and thin clay gouge at the joints. <br />Single- packer permeability tests were conducted in each core hole. Testing occurred <br />in 10 -foot sections at the base of the core holes at completion of coring. The bedrock <br />permeability generally ranged from 2X10 to 2.5X10 " cm /s, indicating moderate <br />permeability. The results of the packer permeability testing are presented with the <br />core logs and boring logs in Appendix A.1. <br />Results from the SWC geotechnical laboratory tests conducted on the soil samples <br />obtained within the VLF footprint are summarized in Table 3 and presented in <br />Appendix B.1.1. Results from the AMEC geotechnical laboratory tests are <br />Project No.: 74201125G0 Page 14 <br />1 September 2011 <br />amec. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.