2012-03-14_REVISION - P2010026 ‎(4)‎

• Permit No: P2010026
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 3/14/2012
• Doc Name: MODIFICATION TO NOI
• From: SHELL FRONTIER OIL & GAS
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: MD1
• Email Name: THM
• Email Name: SSS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

10.1. Temporary Abandonment Procedures 54
10.2. Treatment 54
10.3. Control of Process Solutions and Hydrocarbon Products 54
10.4. Injection 54
10.5. Subsidence 54
10.6. Surface Water Pollution Control 55
10.7. Natural Resources Protections 55
10.8. Other Permits 55
REFERENCES 57
LIST OF TABLES
Table 5.1:
Table 5.2:
Table 5.3:
Table 6.1:
Table 7.1:
Table 11.1:
Water quality data for 138 -4 -298 pad wells.
Preliminary groundwater numeric protection limits proposed for East RDD based
on baseline water quality data.
Baseline water quality.
Well specifications.
Upland drainage community seed mix
East RDD Project Permits, Notices, and Plans.
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Location Map.
Figure 2: Timeline.
Figure 3: East RDD permit boundary, disturbed area boundary and existing structures.
Figure 4: Regional Piceance Basin Hydrology (Hail and Smith, 1994).
Figure 5: Cross - section A -A', Shell East RDD 149 Acre Pilot.
Figure 6: General West - Central Piceance Basin in stratigraphic and hydrostratigraphic
section.
Figure 7: Static model showing nahcolite wt %, Fischer Assay, probability of nahcolite
continuity (leachability), and dawsonite wt %.
Figure 8: Nahcolite morphologies (after Dyni, 1974.)
Figure 9: Nahcolite morphologies as seen in cores.
Figure 10: East RDD surface water features.
Figure 11: USGS Stake Springs Draw Flow Data.
Figure 12: Locations of UAA Study /Reconnaissance in Yellow Creek Basin 2001 -2007.
Figure 13: Potentiometric Surface for the Uppper Aquifer (after Robson and Saulnier, 1981),
Figure 14: Piceance Basin topography and features.
Figure 15: General hydrostratigraphic cross - section across PCB.
Notice of Intent v Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
December 2010