Laserfiche WebLink
Scott, Eric <br />From: Scott, Eric <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:17 AM <br />To: Lazuk, Raymond <br />Subject: TR -19 PDWTP prelim adequacy comments <br />Ray- <br />At first pass I only see a couple of comments on TR -19 <br />Permitting of new water supplies /wells as previously mentioned (Section 3.1) <br />Please add permit boundary to figures 2 and 3 <br />- What role (if any) would this system play in a "design storm event" and is the system/ "Event Pond" sized or <br />designed to meet the design storm event criteria as required by 7.3.1(3)? Please include (Section 2.5 ?) <br />- Please provide some statement as to how Climax will satisfy section 7.3.2(2) of the rule. (Section 2.9) <br />What kind of leak detection /monitoring /containment is being used on the supply and return lines to and from the <br />plant to the Mayflower TSF (Section 2.6.2) <br />- I don't see any reason at this time that DRMS couldn't include the wetlands mitigation project in the existing bond <br />- especially considering the proposed timeframe for completion. Do you need any "specific" language from me to <br />satisfy COE or do we just need to approve the TR with the mitigation plan included as it is? <br />That's pretty much it for now I think... I can follow up with the "official letter" pretty soon. <br />Eric Scott <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman St Rm 215 <br />Denver CO 80203 <br />Ph 303 - 866 -3567 x8140 <br />Fax 303 - 832 -8106 <br />1 <br />