Laserfiche WebLink
ECOSA Evaluation Adrian Brown <br />piezometric pressures and heads at these well nests have been monitored continuously for more <br />than a year. The results are presented for the ECOSA area in Plate 13. All except one of the <br />strings within the proposed ECOSA footprint exhibit strong vertical downward gradient ( >0.95). <br />One nest (COB -01+ OSABH -02) exhibits a weaker gradient ( -0.07) but even a 7% gradient is <br />significant, and would be considered high in a horizontal groundwater flow environment. This <br />well nest is the only one within the footprint that is located in Precambrian rock; a companion <br />piezometer string 1,500 feet northwest (GVPW -01) is also completed in Precambrian rock and <br />exhibits no vertical gradient. These results indicate that there is sufficient vertical downward <br />gradient to support vertical infiltration under gravity in the Tertiary rocks, but only marginal <br />vertical downward gradient in the Precambrian within the proposed ECOSA footprint. <br />Based on the results of the extensive groundwater investigation beneath the footprint of the proposed <br />redesigned ECOSA, the following conclusions are drawn: <br />1. Diatremal Locations. Water flow from the base of ECOSA will proceed vertically through the <br />underlying colluvium and into the volcanic bedrock of the Diatreme, ultimately joining the <br />regional groundwater table and exiting the Diatreme via the Carlton Tunnel. In these locations <br />there is no requirement for construction to aid infiltration. <br />2. Precambrian Locations. Exfiltration from the base of ECOSA at locations underlain by <br />Precambrian rock may be prevented from flowing vertically downward through the colluvium to <br />the bedrock, and then to the regional water table by the lack of a sufficiently high vertical <br />downward hydraulic gradient to allow all the water to flow via the Precambrian rock to the <br />Diatreme. In these locations CC &V is proposing the construction of drainage measures to direct <br />any potential flow to the Diatreme. The selected method is the installation of trenches along <br />contour at the base of the proposed ECOSA, which will prevent downhill flow of seepage along <br />the ground surface to potentially emerge from the toe ECOSA and potentially impact surface <br />water and wetland resources. The design and location of these trenches are presented in Plate 14. <br />4.3 Impact Evaluation Verification <br />4.3.1 Cripple Creek Mining District Model <br />The fate of seepage from ECOSA has been verified by the use of the quantitative groundwater flow and <br />transport model of the District'. The quantitative model was created as follows: <br />• Surface topography of a 24 square mile area centered on the District, derived from recent <br />contouring at 500 foot grid spacing. <br />• Twenty -two vertical layers, each up to 250 feet thick, extending from elevation 10,800 feet msl <br />to elevation 5,000 ft msl. <br />• Hydraulic conductivity values applied to all 60,000 model cells based on geology using the <br />results of 74 permeability tests conducted in wells with depths up to 1,000 feet. <br />' The Cripple Creek Mining District groundwater flow and transport model is presented and described as Attachment XXX of the <br />Hydrogeochemistry Report (ABC, 2011)to the Hydrogeochemistry <br />1385E.20120224 12 <br />