Laserfiche WebLink
ground water resources above GV -01 (see Figure 2 -2 for WHEX limits). The <br />development of WHEX also will capture a portion of the precipitation (snow and rain) in <br />the upper reaches of Grassy Valley, which will be infiltrated to the Diatreme. However, <br />due to the widespread and on -going vertical drainage of the Diatreme and adjacent <br />granites in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of Grassy Valley, the impacts to the <br />shallow and deep bedrock ground water resources in the middle and lower reaches of <br />Grassy Valley will be minimal in the monitor wells, piezometers, and boreholes. <br />The water quality in the remaining monitor wells, piezometers, and boreholes completed <br />in the alluvium and bedrock in the middle and lower reaches of Grassy Valley is expected <br />to be stable and perhaps improve with removal of historic mine features in the upper and <br />middle reaches of Grassy Valley. Water quality conditions in the water that infiltrates to <br />the Diatreme will be controlled by hydrogeochemical conditions detailed in "Cresson <br />Project Hydrogeochemical Evaluation" dated February 2012 and prepared by ABC. <br />The development of WHEX will remove many of the monitor wells, piezometers, and <br />boreholes in the upper reaches of Grassy Valley. The development of the ECOSA will <br />remove numerous monitor wells, piezometers, and boreholes in the middle reaches of <br />Grassy Valley on the south side of the valley. The monitor wells, piezometers, and <br />boreholes that will be lost to MLE2 are noted on Table 4. The ground water levels and <br />water quality conditions in the Grassy Valley will continue to be monitored by the <br />remaining monitor wells, piezometers, and boreholes listed in Section 3 and in Table 6 -4. <br />7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />Surface water data (flows and water quality) have been updated through 2011. Surface water <br />flows in the major drainages of the District are generally low and dominated by seasonal runoff <br />from snowmelt and precipitation. Flows in Cripple Creek and Wilson Creek also are sustained <br />by waste water treatment discharges from the City of Cripple Creek and the City of Victor, <br />respectively. The low surface flows in the District are due to the normal water balance processes <br />(e.g., evapotranspiration) and the vertical drainage within the Diatreme created by the drainage <br />tunnels installed in the early half of the 20 century. These tunnels (represented by the Carlton <br />Tunnel) have lowered the ground water table and in turn, depleted the surface water flows <br />Surface flows in Arequa Gulch also have declined in the last decade due to the phased <br />implementation of the AGVLF, which has captured nearly all the precipitation in the upper <br />reaches of the drainage. Water quality conditions of the surface waters in the District have <br />remained relatively stable over the monitoring record for most of the monitor locations. The <br />9 "Cresson Project Hydrogeochemical Evaluation" dated February 2012 and prepared by ABC. <br />'Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project Hydrologic Evaluation for Mine Life Extension 2 <br />39 <br />