My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (90)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (90)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:13 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 11:02:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL. 2, Appendix 1: Table of Contents & Introduction
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING COMPANY
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cresson Project Hvdrogeochemistry AdrianBrown <br />overlies the Diatreme was constructed in 2002 If this portion of the liner prevented the natural <br />6 inches of infiltration per year on the Diatreme, this would constitute a permanent seepage flow <br />reduction of approximately 80 acre -feet per year (50 gpm) <br />2. Reduction in precipitation. There has been a 0.4 inch per year reduction in precipitation over the <br />last 8 years. At the pre -2002 diatremal infiltration rate of 30 %, the reduction in seepage would <br />be 0.12 inches per year. Over the entire 7 square mile diatremal area, a 0.12 inch per year <br />reduction in infiltration would result in approximately 60 acre -feet per year reduction (35 gpm) <br />in Carlton Tunnel flow. Because infiltration is governed by high precipitation events which are <br />less frequent and less extreme in low precipitation years, a greater reduction in seepage would <br />be expected. <br />3. Sequestration in overburden produced by prior surface mining. Infiltrating water cannot pass <br />through overburden until it reaches its field moisture capacity, which has been measured to be <br />7.5% by volume in column tests on crushed ore (CC &V, 2000). When the field capacity is <br />reached, exfiltration from the base of the overburden approximately equals infiltration. The total <br />area covered by overburden in 2011 was approximately 600 acres. If the natural infiltration of 6 <br />inches per year was sequestered by this overburden, this would constitute a (temporary) Carlton <br />Tunnel flow reduction of 300 acre -feet per year ( -180 gpm). This does not appear to be <br />occurring, as at most 160 acre -feet per year (100 gpm) of the reduction is unaccounted for by <br />changes in the above two categories. Further, the flow reduction due to sequestration is not <br />observed to have increased over time, as would be expected with the increase in overburden <br />produced. What is occurring is likely more complex: sequestration is occurring in newer <br />overburden, but the effect on Carlton Tunnel flow is being compensated for by exfiltration from <br />overburden and mine backfill areas where field capacity has already been reached, and flow of <br />infiltrating water has resumed. The result is that net sequestration has reached approximate <br />steady state, and is not expected to change with future mine extension, including MLE2. <br />Taken together, the reduction in Carlton Tunnel flow reduction since 2002 is 10% is due to the recent <br />reduction in precipitation, 25% is due to covering of diatremal catchment by the AGVLF, and the <br />remaining 65% is due to the net effects of sequestration. <br />The character of the regional ground water system flow from the Carlton Tunnel portal has also changed <br />since 2002. The variation of flow rate as a result of precipitation is much more muted, with little <br />correlation between precipitation peaks and tunnel outflow since that time. This is attributed to the <br />closure by the current surface mining activities of most of the direct points of access for precipitation <br />and storm water flow into the Diatreme via underground mine openings (mainly shafts, and subsidence <br />and collapse areas). The infiltration and storm water flow that formerly reached the Carlton Tunnel had <br />more potential direct infiltration routes, resulting in a portion of the flow arriving shortly after the <br />4 The AGVLF was expanded to approximately 400 acres in 2002, with the expansion for the first time covering a portion of the Diatreme. <br />It was further expanded to 514 acres in 2011, with essentially all of the expansion occurring in locations underlain by diatremal rock. <br />There has been too little time to see if this latest change has further reduced flow at the Carlton Tunnel portal. <br />5 "Permanent" meaning continuing until the AGVLF liner system is breached at closure. <br />1385L.20120125 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.