My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (104)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (104)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:33:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL. 1, Exhibit U
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING COMPANY
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The proposed MLE2 development will not increase the long -term regional ground water <br />flow rate or the flow rate from the regional water table observed at the Carlton Tunnel <br />portal <br />• All precipitation water infiltrating to ground water through MLE2 mine facilities (mine <br />areas, mine backfill, overburden storage areas, and reclaimed disturbed land) will pass by <br />subsurface flow paths through the diatreme to the regional ground water table and <br />eventually flow to Fourmile Creek via the Carlton Tunnel portal <br />• Any products of sulfide oxidation in overburden mined, in -place rock exposed, or land <br />disturbed as a result of MLE2 will be naturally neutralized along the subsurface flow <br />paths in the diatreme, limiting transport of metals and other constituents to levels that are <br />within the permitted limits for regional ground water flow from the Carlton Tunnel <br />portal. The naturally available calcium carbonate in the diatreme along the flow pathway <br />for infiltrated water from MLE2 facilities is more than 500 times the mass required to <br />neutralize the products of oxidation of all of the sulfide minerals exposed by the proposed <br />MLE2 <br />• There will be no deleterious change in any saturated ground water or surface water <br />chemistry as a result of MLE2 <br />The information derived from the ground water hydrology and geochemistry investigations and <br />evaluation was considered during development of the mining and reclamation plans for MLE2. <br />The design requirement was that there would be no potential impact or change in the saturated <br />ground water or surface water chemistry as a result of MLE2. <br />4.6 Hydrology <br />The following discussion of surface water and ground water hydrology is a summary of the more <br />detailed information contained in Appendix 2, Hydrologic Evaluation, Volume II. <br />4.6.1. Surface Water <br />Regionally, surface water flows from the Cresson Project area are tributary to the Upper <br />Arkansas River Basin. On the south side, surface water would flow into Theresa Gulch <br />and Bateman Creek which are tributaries to Wilson Creek, that then flows into Fourmile <br />Creek which ultimately flow into the Upper Arkansas River Basin. On the west side, <br />surface water would flow into Poverty Gulch, Squaw Gulch, and Arequa Gulch, all <br />tributaries to Cripple Creek, which also flows into Four Mile Creek. On the north side, <br />surface water would flow into Grassy Valley, a tributary to Beaver Creek. Drawing G -1 <br />shows the surface water system including a two -mile radius around the Cresson Project <br />permit boundary. Each of the drainages is discussed separately below. <br />Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project Mine Life Extension 2 <br />4 -8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.