My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (28)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (28)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:54:50 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 3:02:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/7/2012
Doc Name
USFWS Biological Opinion
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 19
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
McClane Canyon Mine Expansion and Fruits Loadout Facility Biological Assessment <br />Final restoration at the coal mine waste disposal pile would occur after A reaches its final <br />capacity. Cover material and topsoil are contemporaneously placed on the pile. Final <br />reclamation involves covering the remainder of the pile with cover material and topsoil, seeding, <br />and mulching. <br />2.3.2 Loadout Facility <br />To transport: coal on the Union Pacific railroad mainline to markets east and west of Colorado, <br />CAM is proposing to construct -a unit train Loadout Facility approximately 18 miles south of the <br />McClane Canyon Mine. A total of 43.88 acres would be disturbed during construction of the <br />Loadout Facility. Surface disturbance associated with the Loadout Facility would primarily occur <br />from construction of haul roads, an access road, light use roads, a truck dump (coal off - loading <br />area), a coal stockpile, a loading system, and a rail loop and spur track. Other facilities and <br />utilities required for the operation of the Loadout Facility would result in additi onal surface <br />disturbances including: maintenance trailer, fuel tank, power line, transformer, motor 'controi <br />center, and three sediment ponds. Haul trucks would transport clean coal from the Mine to the <br />Loadout Facility via State Highway 139 and -U:S. Highway 6 /State Highway 50. Operation of the <br />Loadout Facility would require approximately 9.7 acre -feet per year of water depletions for dust <br />suppression, and losses through evaporation.10 - <br />Access Road. An approximate 0.25 mile gravel road would provide access to the Loadout <br />Facility for Loadout Facility operators and commercial vehicles. The road would be reclaimed <br />after the life of the Proposed Action. . <br />Haul Roads. Haul Road #1=1 provides access for haul trucks transporting clean coal from the <br />Mine into the Loadout Facility from County Road 15. The road would be a minimt4m of 25 feet <br />Wide and would be approxirriately 0.58 rhile.long. Haul Road #1 would lead to a 0.25 mile loop <br />road (Haul Road #2) varying in width be 12 and 20 feet that would provide access to the <br />Loadout Facility. Earthen berms would be constructed along the haul roads to direct drainage <br />to collection - ditches. Haul roads would be constructed with gravel and would be watered and <br />cleaned as necessary to control fugitive dust emissions. Chemical dust suppression may also <br />be used on heavily traveled roads. <br />Railroad -Spur /Loadout. The rail spur would be constructed south of the Union Pacific mainline <br />and would be approximately 11,300 feet long (16.62 acres of surface disturbance) to <br />accommodate unit trains with 100 to 110 coal rail cars. The rail spur would take off from the <br />mainline and traverse the land in generally an easterly direction, crossing Reed Wash. A- rail <br />bridge would -be constructed within the 100 -year floodplain of the Colorado River and across <br />Reed_ Wash. Seven rows of steel pilings would be required to support the bridge, of which two <br />steel pilings would be embedded in concrete bridge abutments at each end. The bridge has <br />been designed to.ensure no pilings would be placed directly In the Reed Wash channel. Rip - <br />rap would be placed on the east bank of.Reed Wash extending from the ordinary high water <br />mark (OHWM) to the concrete abutment supporting the bridge on the east side. The rip -rap and <br />grading on'the east side of the channel would increase the water conveyance area under the <br />bridge during a 100 -year flood event. On the east 'side of Reed Wash, a loop would be <br />constructed that would serve as the loading point for'theboal. <br />Best management practices (BMPs) would be used to control erosion from -the rail spur <br />including 1) exposed surface areas would be stabilized to promote a reduction in the rate and <br />volume of runoff; 2) sediment filters such as a silt fence would be placed every 200 to 300 feet <br />along the the of the slope on. the exterior portions of the loop to reduce overland flow velocity, <br />reduce runoff. volume, and trap sediment; 3) the outslopes of the rail spur would be'seeded and <br />10 Section 2.04.11 in the Fruita Loadout Permit Application revision dated August 19, 2011 <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.